Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden DU Cognitive Dissonance Syndrome [View all]morningfog
(18,115 posts)15. You are 100 percent correct. NSA is the story
and should be the story. Snowden is irrelevant. The shift to focusing on his pursuit from his personal life and motivation is just further distraction.
I hope that more info is released to refocus on what matters here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your last point is interesting, though I suspect Snowden would still have revealed...
NoodleyAppendage
Jun 2013
#5
How did you feel about the leaks during the Bush administration? Did you agree that the NYT
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#37
No, I the majority bashing Snowden are just as sincere as those advocating his situation
still_one
Jun 2013
#7
Do you honestly believe that China wasn't already aware of the US hacking?
NoodleyAppendage
Jun 2013
#11
"He went to a foreign nation to reveal our secrets." And your dog told you that.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#34
I find it interesting that you are so definite on knowing what he did and why.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#59
It is not the point, and I do not believe they were aware of Hong Kong being hacked. My main point
still_one
Jun 2013
#22
So you were against the leaks during the Bush years then, the ones that caused the accusation
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#38
I agree that who cares if he is a hero or a traitor, but his credibility does matter
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#14
They took a few futile shots at the documents, then changed tactics to shooting the messenger.
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#19
I don't trust him. That does not mean I agree with what the government is doing.
hrmjustin
Jun 2013
#12
He made a choice to put the collective above himself. Most people don't have the guts.
dkf
Jun 2013
#28
I really like your post, although I disagree with substantial portions of it. Since you mention
HardTimes99
Jun 2013
#49