Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeState

(10,570 posts)
41. Metadata is extremely useful and informative
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:33 PM
Jun 2013

There is a reason the grocery store wants you to use your phone number or "discount card" - they sell the metadata to advertisers and use it themselves.

One just has to look at Google to see how profitable metadata is - its Googles business model.

I think it's the dashes or other odd characters in the url that break the 'link' button function. nt Electric Monk Jun 2013 #1
Link worked for me think Jun 2013 #2
I meant the DU hyperlink function, to make a block of text a working link Electric Monk Jun 2013 #7
ahh. misunderstood. TY /nt think Jun 2013 #14
I saw Susan Landau interviewed a few days ago and she explained the Meta Data KoKo Jun 2013 #3
Correct it's behavior modeling. This turns galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #5
Voice calls are line switched. Downwinder Jun 2013 #4
Yes. They reveal one part to make it all seem innocent, but really they haven't fessed up to the dkf Jun 2013 #6
These cases can take decades to go thru the courts; for example" Melinda Jun 2013 #8
At the time of the Patriot Act, Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #10
One point to make about Sen. Di Feinstein - she is NOT truedelphi Jun 2013 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author Downwinder Jun 2013 #13
my intuition was right undergroundpanther Jun 2013 #9
You have to abstract away from this Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #31
Metadata hasn't had constitutional protection, ever Recursion Jun 2013 #11
Not so sure about that Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #18
LOL ,Feinstein the liberal Dem bahrbearian Jun 2013 #12
Can I suggest you address your selective editing above pkdu Jun 2013 #15
I used the three dots thing to indicate where I edited, Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #17
Your para 2 and para3 has missing sentences between . Fair enough on the ....I used to do same pkdu Jun 2013 #21
Hmm. Why? Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #22
Most criminals , esp. Federal Crimes are smarter at evading capture than you give them credit for.. pkdu Jun 2013 #24
You remember when Olbermann had that whole thing on dumb criminals? Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #28
"Ellipsis points are used to represent an omission from a direct quotation when it is cited ..." panzerfaust Jun 2013 #49
The generally accepted standard here at DU seems to contrary to writingxxx.yyy pkdu Jun 2013 #66
Obama didn't give this a legal structure. That legal structure was put into place pnwmom Jun 2013 #16
Which Obama said he would Debate and Change ,, in 2007. bahrbearian Jun 2013 #23
There were changes after Obama was elected -- things were even worse before. pnwmom Jun 2013 #25
So when is he proposing to debate and Change it Its been 4 years. Wait and Hope. bahrbearian Jun 2013 #26
You're not getting it Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #27
He still says debate it treestar Jun 2013 #30
It would be the single best thing he did. n/t Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #32
He has had 4 years to bring this to debate this,he needs a bill to sign,unless he signs blank pages. bahrbearian Jun 2013 #33
At this point it is far easier to count up the things that O truedelphi Jun 2013 #48
It's all starting to turn into jello in my head, but I'm pretty sure that passage of HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #62
...as a journalist... FirstLight Jun 2013 #19
Use a Tracphone or something similar. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #20
I think the opposite treestar Jun 2013 #29
This is what bothers me. Blue_In_AK Jun 2013 #34
Exactly n/t Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #35
Question 90-percent Jun 2013 #36
Kind of, although technically they weren't collecting in 1997. I think. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #37
Constitutionality is in the eye of the beholder. HomerRamone Jun 2013 #38
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #39
Same here - It was encouraging to read this truedelphi Jun 2013 #54
So, by this argument intaglio Jun 2013 #40
No - not if you give them permission FreeState Jun 2013 #44
When you sign up for a phone, have you read all the T & Cs? intaglio Jun 2013 #70
Metadata is extremely useful and informative FreeState Jun 2013 #41
First ProSense Jun 2013 #42
What you're pointing out is true in a narrow sense, Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #60
Great post. Thank you. ~nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #43
There was an article in DISCOVER magazine a few months back that describe how this data is used rwsanders Jun 2013 #45
But it is more than establishing a profile. truedelphi Jun 2013 #52
thanks for linking to her site madrchsod Jun 2013 #56
I agree completely, just trying to point out that even "Metadata" isn't innocuous rwsanders Jun 2013 #67
I should alert on this- complaining about the link button. No whining about DU. In other news, silvershadow Jun 2013 #46
Once more the ACLU steps into the breach to defend an ignorant public Lefty Nast Jun 2013 #50
"he has managed to give this thing a legal framework within which it can be done." KamaAina Jun 2013 #51
And this metadatabank gives the executive branch JDPriestly Jun 2013 #53
Obama is especially dangerous? liberal N proud Jun 2013 #55
yes it would. madrchsod Jun 2013 #57
Whats with the title? DCBob Jun 2013 #58
mr "bent on destruction" (how clever), and other true geniuses on Du i suppose... dionysus Jun 2013 #59
Yes. Why do you ask? Did you read the OP? Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #61
Yeah, I read it and didnt see those particular words. DCBob Jun 2013 #63
Yes, they're my opinion. Benton D Struckcheon Jun 2013 #64
glad we cleared that up. DCBob Jun 2013 #65
I Think RobinA Jun 2013 #68
... Scurrilous Jun 2013 #69
Obama also signed the NDAA section 1021, providing for the indefinite detention of US citizens Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The real problem Snowden ...»Reply #41