General Discussion

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)

12. There is no legal standard

Reply to Lex (Reply #3)

Sat Jun 22, 2013, 11:54 AM

Jun 2013

The Founders intended it to be that way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2013 OP

"anyone who doesn't immediately move to fix this country" Lex Jun 2013 #1

Yep. In the face of a fascist takeover of our actual democracy, yes. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #2

Well, good luck with that. I don't think that's the legal standard Lex Jun 2013 #3

Thank you. Don't worry, there will be enough to meet the legal standard. I am sure of it. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #5

There is no legal standard MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #12

Actually there is. Lex Jun 2013 #22

"High crimes and misemeanors" has no real legal meaning. MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #23

It is however the legal standard as per Lex Jun 2013 #29

Going back to your original claim that MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #38

Didn't claim that. nt Lex Jun 2013 #44

"High crimes & misdemeanors" Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author devilgrrl Jun 2013 #13

^^^THIS^^^ Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #18

Thank you. HappyMe Jun 2013 #24

Yes. That is why I said *anyone in the OP. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #34

Well it sure sharp_stick Jun 2013 #7

Really? How? You aren't even aware of who might be impeached or on what charges yet. Yet you silvershadow Jun 2013 #14

So what impeachible offense sharp_stick Jun 2013 #19

*ANY impeachable offense. Short that, primary challenges all the way. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #36

83! Itchinjim Jun 2013 #6

What, pray tell, is 83? Sorry, I don't have my code book handy. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #37

Yup... SidDithers Jun 2013 #40

You must have skipped school the day your teacher DURHAM D Jun 2013 #8

What do *you* think is the definition of an impeachable offense? MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #16

No I am rattling on about many topics. The impeachment would be for an actual impeachable offense. silvershadow Jun 2013 #17

Obama is not the best this country has. The best wouldn't run for office anyway. L0oniX Jun 2013 #9

While those that support this are disgusting individuals, it does not rise to impeachment. The Link Jun 2013 #10

The only way they apparently will evolve is though a rather obvious challenge. Either thru a silvershadow Jun 2013 #20

Maybe Biden will force his hand on it, like on gay marriage. The Link Jun 2013 #21

Biden needs to be President at this point. He is more for the working man than Obama is. nt silvershadow Jun 2013 #28

At least it's only a pre-impeachment thread sharp_stick Jun 2013 #11

Oh good lord RudynJack Jun 2013 #15

Um, I know plenty about impeachment. That's why it's not an impeachment thread, its a Pre- silvershadow Jun 2013 #25

Self Delete Is Your Friend stevenleser Jun 2013 #26

Never. This is, in fact, my final post as far as I am concerned. I will leave it, as I silvershadow Jun 2013 #31

Whether you recognize it or not, I'm trying to help you. This OP is extremely discrediting for you stevenleser Jun 2013 #41

Me saying I am fed up and will work to impeach anyone involved with chained CPI is discrediting? silvershadow Jun 2013 #43

I am disappointed in President Obama... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #27

Executing Americans without trial ... GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #32

If he personally ordered the execution of Americans, yes... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #35

your op takes lame to new lows cali Jun 2013 #30

I am well aware that the chained CPI is not impeachable. Wow. Did I say that? No. silvershadow Jun 2013 #33

"Don't go overboard with the crazy talk." ucrdem Jun 2013 #42

Isn't that special? BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #45

Yep. It is. I have had it. I actually am considering leaving the party. silvershadow Jun 2013 #47

... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #46