Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So 2016 will be a Clinton vs. a Bush? [View all]Beacool
(30,247 posts)46. I know what you mean.
I'm no big fan of Cuomo either.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Howard Dean has said he might run if progressives are not being served.
Agnosticsherbet
Jun 2013
#17
If he is running and has a chance of being the "not Hillary" in the primary, he has my vote
karynnj
Jun 2013
#45
Nobody named Bush or Clinton should be allowed within a 10 mile radius of the White House
tularetom
Jun 2013
#21
Yes. The Establishment met in 2007 to determine who the next President should be.
Nye Bevan
Jun 2013
#25
Back in 2007, a good friend of mine told me that this was actually the case
MannyGoldstein
Jun 2013
#28
It strikes me the GOP is good at nominating the least insane of their candidates.
BlueCheese
Jun 2013
#51
I would offer you a beer, but i only have Coors :p and some dont consider it alcohol
darkangel218
Jun 2013
#54