General Discussion

Number23

(24,544 posts)

99. Brother, you AIN'T LYING. Whew, all kinds of "sensitivities" have been revealed

Reply to MADem (Reply #78)

Thu Jun 20, 2013, 07:13 PM

Jun 2013

And it's probably long past overdue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

135 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Elizabeth Warren: Poutrage or Hate? [View all] SomethingFishy Jun 2013 OP

She didn't get her pony. progressoid Jun 2013 #1

Clearly, she's taking a principled stand. I don't think she's racist, it's not poutrage or hate. NYC_SKP Jun 2013 #2

I do disagree with Obama.. a lot. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #6

Oh. Well, there are probably a few people who just take cheap shots and aren't good at discussion. NYC_SKP Jun 2013 #10

It could be in the delivery. Moosepoop Jun 2013 #12

I get this BillyRibs Jun 2013 #108

I don't know where you stand personally. pnwmom Jun 2013 #117

It might help if cartach Jun 2013 #118

It's both, and you forgot envy. To make it worse, all three are based on racism. idwiyo Jun 2013 #3

She's a traitor, anti-American, a Paulite, a racist and she is helping the terrorists. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #4

THat is what they want you to believe AngryAmish Jun 2013 #8

Oy Vey! Ford_Prefect Jun 2013 #36

And she's part-Native American Indian ReRe Jun 2013 #107

Someone usually throws "ratfucker" around at some point. Dragonfli Jun 2013 #119

Elizabeth Warren never really loved him! QC Jun 2013 #5

^^this^^ Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #55

She has boxes in her garage. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #7

And puts cream in her coffee. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #56

French roast, probably. MNBrewer Jun 2013 #76

lol ctsnowman Jun 2013 #81

String her up... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #110

Don't compare her to Snowden Progressive dog Jun 2013 #84

The same kind of empty ad hominem rhetoric... JackRiddler Jun 2013 #87

I didn't use ad hominem rhetoric, you did Progressive dog Jun 2013 #89

What grade are you in? JackRiddler Jun 2013 #93

ad hominem huh Jack Progressive dog Jun 2013 #94

Do her neighbors like her? Aerows Jun 2013 #127

Sigh. If DU limited itself to factual complaints and opposing nominations like Warren did... Recursion Jun 2013 #9

Bullshit. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #17

BINGO! Coccydynia Jun 2013 #37

Double Bingo byeya Jun 2013 #88

Triple bingo! Enthusiast Jun 2013 #120

yep Phlem Jun 2013 #92

+ 1,000 cantbeserious Jun 2013 #101

Bullshit Marrah_G Jun 2013 #26

Yep. Exactly. nt redqueen Jun 2013 #51

LOLOL Skittles Jun 2013 #53

Facts are being presented and dismissed by people who can no longer be objective Hydra Jun 2013 #67

+1,000 !!!! MADem Jun 2013 #78

Brother, you AIN'T LYING. Whew, all kinds of "sensitivities" have been revealed Number23 Jun 2013 #99

I'm learning an awful lot. MADem Jun 2013 #100

Welcome to my world, MADem. Number23 Jun 2013 #105

internet warriors, they seem more concerned with attacking others JI7 Jun 2013 #104

+1 Logical Jun 2013 #114

The meanest and nastiest 'warriors' are, by and large, strangers to me. MADem Jun 2013 #135

Not just today. A whole lot has been revealed about certain people here over the past several sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #133

It is hate based poutrage because she did not get her pony. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #11

More of a razecist than Paula Deen bigwillq Jun 2013 #13

It's ProSense Jun 2013 #14

Nope, so far no one is going to stand against her.. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #22

Don't you feel special?... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #59

I don't think these conversations are productive. TekGryphon Jun 2013 #15

The answer, I suggest, is that inexperienced people think that there are "imaginary" cliques. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2013 #42

+1 treestar Jun 2013 #45

What we have are disruptors and shills pretending to be Democrats. backscatter712 Jun 2013 #46

Exactly, and doing a very bad job of it as always. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #50

Exactly! So when will disruptors and shills who constantly bash Obama leave? ConservativeDemocrat Jun 2013 #68

Post removed Post removed Jun 2013 #73

They won't leave. They crave dissension and purging to the point of addiction. great white snark Jun 2013 #75

There are no 'sides'. There is serious issue of possible violations of the rights of the American sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #49

I took yesterday off... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2013 #60

Every debate has sides, and I'm happy to hear both sides, but... TekGryphon Jun 2013 #69

I have posted OPs on the issues. If you are tired of all the bickering about irrelevancies, then sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #70

You've posted very informative OPs here on this and other topics and a close minded coterie byeya Jun 2013 #90

Pretty much the opposite of productive pscot Jun 2013 #62

+1 great white snark Jun 2013 #71

Maybe, but one thing is clear... NorthCarolina Jun 2013 #129

The same people who have double standards when it comes to any criticism of Obama forestpath Jun 2013 #16

You mean "our" President finally appointed one from "our" side to his cabinet? RedCloud Jun 2013 #18

Neither Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #19

Oh I see, so anyone on DU complaining about Obama SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #23

Illogical treestar Jun 2013 #47

Just where did I say "anyone?" Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #61

She is part of Team Obama and will be on stage in 2016 congratulating Hillary graham4anything Jun 2013 #20

So you are saying it's possible to support Obama and still SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #25

Sorry, but I don't and never will stand with BushPaulNaderfamilyinc. graham4anything Jun 2013 #30

Why is this acceptable dissent by Warren? reusrename Jun 2013 #64

True Democratic supporters do nuance. EOM, have a nice day. No further needed. graham4anything Jun 2013 #65

Warren is anything but nuanced on this issue. I don't think that's it. reusrename Jun 2013 #82

Thank you graham4anything! Iliyah Jun 2013 #34

Between this and calling the SCOTUS 'a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Chamber of Commerce' IDemo Jun 2013 #21

Its the usual battle between the legislative and executive branches over trade bhikkhu Jun 2013 #24

I don't see hate or evil on either side either.. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #27

In the OP she objects to the details of the procedure bhikkhu Jun 2013 #32

Huh? enlightenment Jun 2013 #52

Here's a little about that: bhikkhu Jun 2013 #113

Okay - enlightenment Jun 2013 #115

Article II, Section II: "He shall have Power...to make treaties." bhikkhu Jun 2013 #134

yeah but usually it's dems vs republicans Doctor_J Jun 2013 #132

Neither, cuz clinton made obama do it. DUH! allin99 Jun 2013 #28

She disagrees. That's her right. Arkana Jun 2013 #29

This is a disgusting op that is just flamebait karynnj Jun 2013 #31

On DU, ANY criticism of the President's policies are seen as personal attacks BrotherIvan Jun 2013 #38

LOL, now you worry about flamebait! But the post calling me racist was ok?? n-t Logical Jun 2013 #39

YOU KNOW IT, LOGICAL Skittles Jun 2013 #54

I never saw that post, don't know what led to it - and would likely have alerted on it, had I seen i karynnj Jun 2013 #80

I agree with this: sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #74

And I agree with you on this: karynnj Jun 2013 #79

I too would summer-hazz Jun 2013 #96

PLUS ONE! nt Enthusiast Jun 2013 #122

The only hatred I see her displaying is her contempt for Big Money sucking up our democracy Larkspur Jun 2013 #33

Me too! nt Enthusiast Jun 2013 #123

"I'm not saying she's a racist, but a lot of it is racism" whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #35

I strongly support Elizabeth Warren regarding openess and disclosure on this trade deal. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #40

How ungrateful. The Link Jun 2013 #41

who here is qualified to judge poutrage from outrage. leftyohiolib Jun 2013 #43

She does not disagree with everything treestar Jun 2013 #44

I love Elizabeth Warren The Second Stone Jun 2013 #48

WTF kind of question is this? Politicub Jun 2013 #57

This is clearly sarcasim Bradical79 Jun 2013 #121

Yep. Anyone who questions the supremacy and authority of Benevolent Global Fascism Zorra Jun 2013 #58

She is the logical heir to Kennedy Fearless Jun 2013 #63

Can't we do without the name calling? watoos Jun 2013 #66

Obama's "transparency" is only for his 600 US corporate advisers - they have input. Divernan Jun 2013 #72

Cheap shot. EW agrees with POTUS on most issues. She doesn't carp and gripe at him MADem Jun 2013 #77

emo-proggery n/t Enrique Jun 2013 #83

Why the desire sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #85

Thank you, SomethingFishy. JDPriestly Jun 2013 #86

There's a huge difference between criticizing Obama to try to make the govt better baldguy Jun 2013 #91

How about principled? Jakes Progress Jun 2013 #95

Right now summer-hazz Jun 2013 #97

She was Greenwalded. East Coast Pirate Jun 2013 #98

This message was self-deleted by its author DirkGently Jun 2013 #102

Warren 2016!! ErikJ Jun 2013 #103

you seem upset that there weren't Warren Bashing Threads so you can play victim and martyr JI7 Jun 2013 #106

You seem upset that this post has 107 recs and seems to be making a great point! n-t Logical Jun 2013 #109

False dichotomy, it is both hate and poutrage and probably a side order of racism too n/t Fumesucker Jun 2013 #111

"he American people have the right to know more" MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #112

Yeah, you can't ever disagree w/Obama, or the GOP WINS !!! blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #116

K&R Enthusiast Jun 2013 #124

This message was self-deleted by its author another_liberal Jun 2013 #125

That is the dumbest QUESTION I have seen...... BrainDrain Jun 2013 #126

Allowed to disagree? another_liberal Jun 2013 #128

More govt secrecy, trade deals outside the light of day,. Why? Civilization2 Jun 2013 #130

she doesn't understand chess Doctor_J Jun 2013 #131