Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NSA Bombshell Story Falling Apart Under Scrutiny; Key Facts Turning Out to Be Inaccurate [View all]
http://thedailybanter.com/2013/06/nsa-story-falling-apart-under-scrutiny-key-facts-turning-out-to-be-inaccurate/NSA Bombshell Story Falling Apart Under Scrutiny; Key Facts Turning Out to Be Inaccurate
By Bob Cesca · June 08,2013
greenwald_nsa(UPDATE below.)
It turns out, the NSA PRISM story isnt quite the bombshell that everyone said it was. Yes, there continues to be a serious cause for concern when it comes to government spying and overreach with its counter-terrorism efforts. But the reporting from Glenn Greenwald and the Washington Post has been shoddy and misleading.
snip//
But the Greenwald and Washington Post stories are somehow bombshells, taken at face value. Has our collective attention span become so ridiculously short that were suddenly shocked by news of the NSA attaining data about Americans as a means of fighting evildoers? Has everyone been asleep for the last 12 years?
To summarize, yes, the NSA routinely requests information from the tech giants. But the NSA doesnt have direct access to servers nor is it randomly collecting information about you personally. Yet rending of garments and general apoplexy has ruled the day, complete with predictable invective about the president being worse than Bush and that anyone who reported on the new information debunking the initial report was and is an Obamabot apologist.
Speaking for myself on that front, Im not apologizing for anyone. Im merely noting that Greenwald and the Washington Post reported inaccurate information. Ive spent a considerable chunk of my writing career eviscerating the post-9/11 surveillance state and its accompanying trespasses against privacy and civil liberties. While Im encouraged by the presidents vow to begin rolling back the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, winding down the endless war and its accompanying endless war powers, Im also concerned about the continued bartering of privacy for the sake of a little more security a through-line that began under George W. Bush and continues today.
But this prioritization of security over liberty wasnt invented by this president. It began as the unforgivable exploitation of fear in the days after 9/11 and became entwined in the American worldview. Weve sadly become just as accustomed to unnecessary searches and privacy intrusions as the federal government has grown accustomed to going beyond its mandate to smoke out the evildoers.
UPDATE: This post by ZDNets Ed Bott is a phenomenal takedown of the Washington Posts reporting on this story, including a side-by-side comparison of the significant changes between the Posts initial article and what it morphed into later. Clearly the Post rushed to press with a half-assed article, subsequently inciting outrage. Then, while everyone had run off to accuse the Obama administration of being worse than Bush the Post altered key facts in the story. Its a dark chapter for American journalism.
http://www.zdnet.com/the-real-story-in-the-nsa-scandal-is-the-collapse-of-journalism-7000016570/
The real story in the NSA scandal is the collapse of journalism
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
164 replies, 29390 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (87)
ReplyReply to this post
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NSA Bombshell Story Falling Apart Under Scrutiny; Key Facts Turning Out to Be Inaccurate [View all]
babylonsister
Jun 2013
OP
There are other laughable speculations from the Internet Blog called The Daily Banter..
bvar22
Jun 2013
#85
Boy, almost everyone here is lucky the alien and sedition act is not still in the Constitution!
xtraxritical
Jun 2013
#128
Adopting the hated Alien and Sedition Acts was, of course, a reason why Jefferson replaced Adams.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2013
#152
Except Scahill, Greenwald, Chomsky, Hedges and the rest of the ratpack, repeatedly.
ucrdem
Jun 2013
#153
"Obama pushed the Cheney agenda far beyond what a President McCain or a President Romney would have
ucrdem
Jun 2013
#157
Well the President says it was a 'leak' that shouldn't have happened. So is he unaware that
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#6
The new meme is the 4th doesn't apply to electronic records of our phones and emails
Dragonfli
Jun 2013
#17
The applicability of the fourth amendment to the online space is complicated. Here's a good article
cascadiance
Jun 2013
#101
Actually, he claims no hero status for himself but reserves that for the whistle-blower.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#22
That don't seem any more angry than any other of his Tweets since he started Tweeting.
Hissyspit
Jun 2013
#119
That was the last day we thought anyone was actually going to do something about it.
Octafish
Jun 2013
#37
NOW: not a big deal... BEFORE: they don't have the capability, old news, Obama haters
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#23
It's sloppy. Once you research the history of this issue, you get a different picture.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#129
He was sloppy to the point of altering the meaning of these issues completely
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#131
Every thing you say is true, afaik. It's legal. It's old. There's nominal oversight.
Laelth
Jun 2013
#133
If you repeal FISA, warrantless wiretapping becomes legal. We can fix or replace it with something
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#134
"NSA Bombshell Story Falling Apart Under Scrutiny". Don't they all eventually?
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#42
"the unforgivable exploitation of fear in the days after 9/11" and "unnecessary searches and
indepat
Jun 2013
#69
The screen name, the attitude, and the conservative views bring to mind Tom "the Hammer" Delay
Dragonfli
Jun 2013
#125
sorry, you can have that place and the Old Elm Tree. Ill stick to DEMOCRATIC Underground.
MjolnirTime
Jun 2013
#144
You have supported every third way conservative feeler Your idol has put out!
Dragonfli
Jun 2013
#146
Just because journalism is dead doesnt mean our govment isnt spying on us.
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#76
Well Sister, We Will Have To Agree To Disagree - Many Of Us No Longer Trust Obama Or This Government
cantbeserious
Jun 2013
#93
Either AQ is "on its heels" and "only a shell of its former self", as we've been told by Obama...
cherokeeprogressive
Jun 2013
#110
This is just another hit piece to make people think it is totally acceptable for the government
GoneFishin
Jun 2013
#117