Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
20. I note that on some occasions, Republicans being against means instant support for the issue
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 09:54 AM
Jun 2013

but on others, such as any rights for LGBT people we are told that our Republican partners must be pleased with what we do, many Democrats spent years and years and years in agreement with Republicans about gay people. Obama spent years agreeing with them, opposing us. Joe Biden literally shouted out that he agreed with Palin during the debates, no marriage rights.
Just odd, that when it is for millions treated unfairly, it is easy for Democrats to stand with Republicans. They will do it again this week, they just took protections for us out of the Immigration Bill to please the GOP, yet again.
So when will 'Karl opposes' become reason enough to stand with those who are not rich ladies born to power with full rights and no empathy? That's my question.
The Republicans opposed a Public Option. Many Democrats,elected and otherwise, stood with them in that, or bowed to the pressure.
Selective 'courage' makes the typical cowardice seem even more pronounced.

Good choice madokie Jun 2013 #1
Watch ReTHUGs whine malaise Jun 2013 #2
You know it madokie Jun 2013 #4
You'd go for sedition; I'd go for malaise Jun 2013 #5
Both applies madokie Jun 2013 #7
Treason is defined in the Constitution. longship Jun 2013 #25
I agree with sedition. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #15
The most cynical Republican response to this could be: karynnj Jun 2013 #13
Potential war hawk? Not ready to judge yet... CrazyJudy Jun 2013 #3
Valid point n/t malaise Jun 2013 #6
Another April Glaspie? Roland99 Jun 2013 #16
Yes, she was, something that's always troubled me.. mountain grammy Jun 2013 #19
it is possible that she learns from mistakes. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2013 #23
Welcome to DU my friend! hrmjustin Jun 2013 #29
I can't wait to find out his selection for UN ambassador... Firebrand Gary Jun 2013 #8
And that's my reason for welcoming the decision malaise Jun 2013 #9
Samantha Power will be UN ambassador. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #12
Yay! Another bloodthirsty neo-liberal warmonger! leftstreet Jun 2013 #31
Diplomacy is war-mongering? JaneyVee Jun 2013 #35
Good. She has earned that position. nt Pragdem Jun 2013 #10
Benghazi! Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #11
I like it! pacalo Jun 2013 #14
Did you also support the invasion of Iraq? She sure did. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #17
k&r... karl rove is not happy, which makes me happy...fuck you karl spanone Jun 2013 #18
I note that on some occasions, Republicans being against means instant support for the issue Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #20
Lying pos karl rove calling anyone a "liar" is Cha Jun 2013 #40
Haha! And they had a problem with her being SOS. AAO Jun 2013 #21
Bravo, Bravo, Bravo!!!!! sheshe2 Jun 2013 #22
malaise Diclotican Jun 2013 #24
There's a term for this in DC: Vindication. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #26
Kick n/t politicasista Jun 2013 #27
That's a good use of her very specific expertise acquired at the U.N. during this particular time.nt patrice Jun 2013 #28
He's on live on GEM$NBComcast malaise Jun 2013 #30
She is a neoliberal warmonger. Too bad. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2013 #32
That is a problem malaise Jun 2013 #33
Just great. Time to push a new war/intervention maybe? quinnox Jun 2013 #34
This was final straw for the RWingers. DCBob Jun 2013 #36
good choice arely staircase Jun 2013 #37
We'll see how Ms. Rice's stewardship as National Security Adviser stacks up against that of indepat Jun 2013 #39
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking - Susan Rice is ...»Reply #20