General Discussion

backwoodsbob

(6,001 posts)

90. ok

Sun May 12, 2013, 02:12 AM

May 2013

'm the guy who delivers over 50 TONS of food every year to our local no kills.

I am the guy who has worked a schedule for vaccines for pups and kittens in shelters for twenty fucking years.

I have posted my adventures with all my rescue pups here...including Big Bear...Little bear..The Budster..junior...and last but not least..the Wonder Terrier...how many rescues have you saved?

Hell...I had PAWS calling me in Virginia asking me to take animals so they wouldn't be put down...I had twenty run cages I payed for and most were full at all times where I payed for the food...hundreds of dollars a month...to save dogs.

I spend more time every day dedicated to no kill shelters than most here will spend in there lives and you question me?

How dare you

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

131 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am a gun owner who believes [View all] backwoodsbob May 2013 OP

That is quite good. Wish you could convince the rest of gun folks that is truly "responsible. " Hoyt May 2013 #1

I agree completely, my dear backwoodsbob! CaliforniaPeggy May 2013 #2

Post removed Post removed May 2013 #54

Random dogs in general or dogs that are attacking other dogs, pets or livestock? KittyWampus May 2013 #56

well.. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #60

or ask me backwoodsbob May 2013 #64

lol. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #67

so you know me personally? backwoodsbob May 2013 #71

honestly. i would not want know you personally. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #73

you really dont have a clue do you? backwoodsbob May 2013 #75

A clue from you? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #80

you arent worth it but backwoodsbob May 2013 #82

I do. flvegan May 2013 #86

ok backwoodsbob May 2013 #90

Jury results: 0-6 LOL Electric Monk May 2013 #85

you really want this? backwoodsbob May 2013 #88

This is embarrassing. flvegan May 2013 #91

you're right..that's not the point backwoodsbob May 2013 #92

I don't obsess. I remember. flvegan May 2013 #95

I agreed with his post. n/t CaliforniaPeggy May 2013 #59

Your choice. nt SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #62

You're showing your ass in a pretty major way here. nt Union Scribe May 2013 #72

how so? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #78

you really dont know me do you backwoodsbob May 2013 #81

Offer one, Bob. Please feel free. flvegan May 2013 #87

You've taken a huge shit on this thread Union Scribe May 2013 #83

Ballistic testing for a data base won't work newmember May 2013 #3

tags in the gun powder and keep track of who buys it ThomThom May 2013 #124

So you want every gun owner in the U.S to have a carry license newmember May 2013 #4

i think any licence would have to be voluntary, voluntaryyou could marry it with a nationwide ccw loli phabay May 2013 #6

So what would be the point of having a mandatory license as posted in the op? newmember May 2013 #9

i dont think you could do a mandatory licence, that was my point loli phabay May 2013 #12

yep backwoodsbob May 2013 #7

Don't most gun owners have that already? newmember May 2013 #11

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #14

I'm not talking about tags , I'm talking about a hunting license newmember May 2013 #17

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #25

Any other rights you think you should let the government decide if they are applicable to you or not Pelican May 2013 #32

None of those other rights you list include safeinOhio May 2013 #61

Doesn't mean that you get to just ignore the second half... Pelican May 2013 #65

It means you may safeinOhio May 2013 #66

Where do you live, and how old are you? I only ask because my State requires EVERYONE born after Ghost in the Machine May 2013 #74

In Florida madville May 2013 #58

nope, i would go for a licencing program that clears people to buy guns that they want loli phabay May 2013 #5

I own several shotguns so i get the problem backwoodsbob May 2013 #8

honestly its not that hard to change the profile of any gun, you can change out the barrel, loli phabay May 2013 #13

The more they get shot the more the barrel and bolt face changes. newmember May 2013 #15

Every ~100 rounds I change the ballistic fingerprint of my rifles sir pball May 2013 #126

Post removed Post removed May 2013 #10

let it go dude backwoodsbob May 2013 #16

For those of us new to the party? Pelican May 2013 #18

I'm sorry backwoodsbob May 2013 #19

Was it feral? newmember May 2013 #20

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #24

That's some crazy shit , I don't own a gun but would have done something drastic myself newmember May 2013 #26

I know backwoodsbob May 2013 #29

Please. flvegan May 2013 #89

I am so looking forward to this. flvegan May 2013 #28

he shot and killed a dangerous animal, thats what one does to protect ones livestock or pets or pers loli phabay May 2013 #30

Did he? flvegan May 2013 #35

well if the dog already killed other animals and attacked his dog and him as he says then yes loli phabay May 2013 #39

You should look into the backstory. flvegan May 2013 #41

why dance around and not just tell the backstory. loli phabay May 2013 #42

From what he posted at the time, he shot a dog in cold blood, needlessly. flvegan May 2013 #45

depends, if the dog had already attacked then came on his property then he shot it. loli phabay May 2013 #47

You do that. n/t flvegan May 2013 #50

no he is right backwoodsbob May 2013 #53

I have three questions. JVS May 2013 #63

it was a bad situation backwoodsbob May 2013 #69

WTF is a "wonder terrier"? rl6214 May 2013 #100

you did the right thing if he couldnt destroy it. rule number one though is the three s's loli phabay May 2013 #121

Your current version of the story being what it is... flvegan May 2013 #76

Were you there? Common Sense Party May 2013 #93

Nope. I have to leave it to the executioner. flvegan May 2013 #96

Sounds like a good decision to me. nt Demo_Chris May 2013 #104

I still have to back you on this. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #115

You got only 6 stitches in the original version of your story... Phentex May 2013 #122

come on what backwoodsbob May 2013 #31

cmon what? backwoodsbob May 2013 #33

LOL! That's two more times. flvegan May 2013 #36

you did the right thing, you have a right to defend your pets and livestock and yourself loli phabay May 2013 #23

Plus, it's just a fucking dog. Deep13 May 2013 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #108

+1 Go Vols May 2013 #130

So you put down a dog that was a threat to others, and you are getting hammered for it? Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #111

so flvegan backwoodsbob May 2013 #21

At last count, you addressed me three times. flvegan May 2013 #27

want to discuss your bring it on threats? backwoodsbob May 2013 #34

My threats? flvegan May 2013 #37

I killed it backwoodsbob May 2013 #40

You executed a dog, tough guy. flvegan May 2013 #84

No, humans get executed. Dogs get put down. nt Deep13 May 2013 #102

I'll address your bring it on post backwoodsbob May 2013 #38

Again? "Bring it on?" flvegan May 2013 #43

He is a dog killer. He needs to deal with that, first and foremost. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #57

Show us a link! Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #110

Post it mwrguy May 2013 #94

... SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #55

Since you used the word compromise, what is the gun control side willing to give up? aikoaiko May 2013 #22

a total ban JI7 May 2013 #44

wow Duckhunter935 May 2013 #48

That's kind of cute. aikoaiko May 2013 #49

for everyone? newmember May 2013 #52

You shoot dogs, don't you? Should there be a license required for that? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #46

"dog" singular. It was dangerous and out of control. Deep13 May 2013 #103

You would not be saying this stuff if it was You and your that was being attacked Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #112

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #114

Animal Control in many parts of the country would come out and shoot it. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #116

Sounds good to me Warpy May 2013 #51

A one sided deal is not a compromise sarisataka May 2013 #68

Would this involve police coming into your home to enforce these laws? Honeycombe8 May 2013 #70

The governmemt does not Jenoch May 2013 #77

sure zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #97

100% background checks for ALL transfers. I'm on board with that. Forget ballistics testing. cherokeeprogressive May 2013 #79

also a gun owner. completely agree. nt Deep13 May 2013 #98

Good luck with that rl6214 May 2013 #99

Sounds great to me. DanTex May 2013 #105

Thanks, BWB, good post. This gun owner supports 100% background checks, limited magazines ... Scuba May 2013 #106

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #107

Gun compromise sounds good to me Tien1985 May 2013 #109

I could back this. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #113

A very good start. 99Forever May 2013 #117

Agree with background checks and registry. bluedigger May 2013 #118

Sensible treestar May 2013 #119

No Daninmo May 2013 #120

Yeah, but you aren't willing to do things to keep others from hurting innocent people. Hoyt May 2013 #127

That is too broad of a statement Daninmo May 2013 #129

I am a gun owner who agrees with you 100% Autumn May 2013 #123

how do you access them in a second ecstatic May 2013 #125

Common Sense GitRDun May 2013 #128

I'll throw in my two cents Revanchist May 2013 #131