General Discussion

backwoodsbob

(6,001 posts)

33. cmon what?

Reply to flvegan (Reply #28)

Sun May 12, 2013, 12:01 AM

May 2013

for five years I've listened to your crap....you want to come on I'll give you my address

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

131 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am a gun owner who believes [View all] backwoodsbob May 2013 OP

That is quite good. Wish you could convince the rest of gun folks that is truly "responsible. " Hoyt May 2013 #1

I agree completely, my dear backwoodsbob! CaliforniaPeggy May 2013 #2

Post removed Post removed May 2013 #54

Random dogs in general or dogs that are attacking other dogs, pets or livestock? KittyWampus May 2013 #56

well.. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #60

or ask me backwoodsbob May 2013 #64

lol. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #67

so you know me personally? backwoodsbob May 2013 #71

honestly. i would not want know you personally. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #73

you really dont have a clue do you? backwoodsbob May 2013 #75

A clue from you? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #80

you arent worth it but backwoodsbob May 2013 #82

I do. flvegan May 2013 #86

ok backwoodsbob May 2013 #90

Jury results: 0-6 LOL Electric Monk May 2013 #85

you really want this? backwoodsbob May 2013 #88

This is embarrassing. flvegan May 2013 #91

you're right..that's not the point backwoodsbob May 2013 #92

I don't obsess. I remember. flvegan May 2013 #95

I agreed with his post. n/t CaliforniaPeggy May 2013 #59

Your choice. nt SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #62

You're showing your ass in a pretty major way here. nt Union Scribe May 2013 #72

how so? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #78

you really dont know me do you backwoodsbob May 2013 #81

Offer one, Bob. Please feel free. flvegan May 2013 #87

You've taken a huge shit on this thread Union Scribe May 2013 #83

Ballistic testing for a data base won't work newmember May 2013 #3

tags in the gun powder and keep track of who buys it ThomThom May 2013 #124

So you want every gun owner in the U.S to have a carry license newmember May 2013 #4

i think any licence would have to be voluntary, voluntaryyou could marry it with a nationwide ccw loli phabay May 2013 #6

So what would be the point of having a mandatory license as posted in the op? newmember May 2013 #9

i dont think you could do a mandatory licence, that was my point loli phabay May 2013 #12

yep backwoodsbob May 2013 #7

Don't most gun owners have that already? newmember May 2013 #11

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #14

I'm not talking about tags , I'm talking about a hunting license newmember May 2013 #17

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #25

Any other rights you think you should let the government decide if they are applicable to you or not Pelican May 2013 #32

None of those other rights you list include safeinOhio May 2013 #61

Doesn't mean that you get to just ignore the second half... Pelican May 2013 #65

It means you may safeinOhio May 2013 #66

Where do you live, and how old are you? I only ask because my State requires EVERYONE born after Ghost in the Machine May 2013 #74

In Florida madville May 2013 #58

nope, i would go for a licencing program that clears people to buy guns that they want loli phabay May 2013 #5

I own several shotguns so i get the problem backwoodsbob May 2013 #8

honestly its not that hard to change the profile of any gun, you can change out the barrel, loli phabay May 2013 #13

The more they get shot the more the barrel and bolt face changes. newmember May 2013 #15

Every ~100 rounds I change the ballistic fingerprint of my rifles sir pball May 2013 #126

Post removed Post removed May 2013 #10

let it go dude backwoodsbob May 2013 #16

For those of us new to the party? Pelican May 2013 #18

I'm sorry backwoodsbob May 2013 #19

Was it feral? newmember May 2013 #20

no backwoodsbob May 2013 #24

That's some crazy shit , I don't own a gun but would have done something drastic myself newmember May 2013 #26

I know backwoodsbob May 2013 #29

Please. flvegan May 2013 #89

I am so looking forward to this. flvegan May 2013 #28

he shot and killed a dangerous animal, thats what one does to protect ones livestock or pets or pers loli phabay May 2013 #30

Did he? flvegan May 2013 #35

well if the dog already killed other animals and attacked his dog and him as he says then yes loli phabay May 2013 #39

You should look into the backstory. flvegan May 2013 #41

why dance around and not just tell the backstory. loli phabay May 2013 #42

From what he posted at the time, he shot a dog in cold blood, needlessly. flvegan May 2013 #45

depends, if the dog had already attacked then came on his property then he shot it. loli phabay May 2013 #47

You do that. n/t flvegan May 2013 #50

no he is right backwoodsbob May 2013 #53

I have three questions. JVS May 2013 #63

it was a bad situation backwoodsbob May 2013 #69

WTF is a "wonder terrier"? rl6214 May 2013 #100

you did the right thing if he couldnt destroy it. rule number one though is the three s's loli phabay May 2013 #121

Your current version of the story being what it is... flvegan May 2013 #76

Were you there? Common Sense Party May 2013 #93

Nope. I have to leave it to the executioner. flvegan May 2013 #96

Sounds like a good decision to me. nt Demo_Chris May 2013 #104

I still have to back you on this. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #115

You got only 6 stitches in the original version of your story... Phentex May 2013 #122

come on what backwoodsbob May 2013 #31

cmon what? backwoodsbob May 2013 #33

LOL! That's two more times. flvegan May 2013 #36

you did the right thing, you have a right to defend your pets and livestock and yourself loli phabay May 2013 #23

Plus, it's just a fucking dog. Deep13 May 2013 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #108

+1 Go Vols May 2013 #130

So you put down a dog that was a threat to others, and you are getting hammered for it? Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #111

so flvegan backwoodsbob May 2013 #21

At last count, you addressed me three times. flvegan May 2013 #27

want to discuss your bring it on threats? backwoodsbob May 2013 #34

My threats? flvegan May 2013 #37

I killed it backwoodsbob May 2013 #40

You executed a dog, tough guy. flvegan May 2013 #84

No, humans get executed. Dogs get put down. nt Deep13 May 2013 #102

I'll address your bring it on post backwoodsbob May 2013 #38

Again? "Bring it on?" flvegan May 2013 #43

He is a dog killer. He needs to deal with that, first and foremost. SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #57

Show us a link! Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #110

Post it mwrguy May 2013 #94

... SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #55

Since you used the word compromise, what is the gun control side willing to give up? aikoaiko May 2013 #22

a total ban JI7 May 2013 #44

wow Duckhunter935 May 2013 #48

That's kind of cute. aikoaiko May 2013 #49

for everyone? newmember May 2013 #52

You shoot dogs, don't you? Should there be a license required for that? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #46

"dog" singular. It was dangerous and out of control. Deep13 May 2013 #103

You would not be saying this stuff if it was You and your that was being attacked Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #112

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #114

Animal Control in many parts of the country would come out and shoot it. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #116

Sounds good to me Warpy May 2013 #51

A one sided deal is not a compromise sarisataka May 2013 #68

Would this involve police coming into your home to enforce these laws? Honeycombe8 May 2013 #70

The governmemt does not Jenoch May 2013 #77

sure zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #97

100% background checks for ALL transfers. I'm on board with that. Forget ballistics testing. cherokeeprogressive May 2013 #79

also a gun owner. completely agree. nt Deep13 May 2013 #98

Good luck with that rl6214 May 2013 #99

Sounds great to me. DanTex May 2013 #105

Thanks, BWB, good post. This gun owner supports 100% background checks, limited magazines ... Scuba May 2013 #106

This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 May 2013 #107

Gun compromise sounds good to me Tien1985 May 2013 #109

I could back this. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #113

A very good start. 99Forever May 2013 #117

Agree with background checks and registry. bluedigger May 2013 #118

Sensible treestar May 2013 #119

No Daninmo May 2013 #120

Yeah, but you aren't willing to do things to keep others from hurting innocent people. Hoyt May 2013 #127

That is too broad of a statement Daninmo May 2013 #129

I am a gun owner who agrees with you 100% Autumn May 2013 #123

how do you access them in a second ecstatic May 2013 #125

Common Sense GitRDun May 2013 #128

I'll throw in my two cents Revanchist May 2013 #131