Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am a gun owner who believes [View all]backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)33. cmon what?
for five years I've listened to your crap....you want to come on I'll give you my address
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is quite good. Wish you could convince the rest of gun folks that is truly "responsible. "
Hoyt
May 2013
#1
Random dogs in general or dogs that are attacking other dogs, pets or livestock?
KittyWampus
May 2013
#56
i think any licence would have to be voluntary, voluntaryyou could marry it with a nationwide ccw
loli phabay
May 2013
#6
Any other rights you think you should let the government decide if they are applicable to you or not
Pelican
May 2013
#32
Where do you live, and how old are you? I only ask because my State requires EVERYONE born after
Ghost in the Machine
May 2013
#74
nope, i would go for a licencing program that clears people to buy guns that they want
loli phabay
May 2013
#5
honestly its not that hard to change the profile of any gun, you can change out the barrel,
loli phabay
May 2013
#13
That's some crazy shit , I don't own a gun but would have done something drastic myself
newmember
May 2013
#26
he shot and killed a dangerous animal, thats what one does to protect ones livestock or pets or pers
loli phabay
May 2013
#30
well if the dog already killed other animals and attacked his dog and him as he says then yes
loli phabay
May 2013
#39
depends, if the dog had already attacked then came on his property then he shot it.
loli phabay
May 2013
#47
you did the right thing if he couldnt destroy it. rule number one though is the three s's
loli phabay
May 2013
#121
you did the right thing, you have a right to defend your pets and livestock and yourself
loli phabay
May 2013
#23
So you put down a dog that was a threat to others, and you are getting hammered for it?
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#111
Since you used the word compromise, what is the gun control side willing to give up?
aikoaiko
May 2013
#22
You shoot dogs, don't you? Should there be a license required for that?
SammyWinstonJack
May 2013
#46
You would not be saying this stuff if it was You and your that was being attacked
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#112
Animal Control in many parts of the country would come out and shoot it.
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#116
100% background checks for ALL transfers. I'm on board with that. Forget ballistics testing.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2013
#79
Thanks, BWB, good post. This gun owner supports 100% background checks, limited magazines ...
Scuba
May 2013
#106