Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am a gun owner who believes [View all]CaliforniaPeggy
(149,580 posts)2. I agree completely, my dear backwoodsbob!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
131 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is quite good. Wish you could convince the rest of gun folks that is truly "responsible. "
Hoyt
May 2013
#1
Random dogs in general or dogs that are attacking other dogs, pets or livestock?
KittyWampus
May 2013
#56
i think any licence would have to be voluntary, voluntaryyou could marry it with a nationwide ccw
loli phabay
May 2013
#6
Any other rights you think you should let the government decide if they are applicable to you or not
Pelican
May 2013
#32
Where do you live, and how old are you? I only ask because my State requires EVERYONE born after
Ghost in the Machine
May 2013
#74
nope, i would go for a licencing program that clears people to buy guns that they want
loli phabay
May 2013
#5
honestly its not that hard to change the profile of any gun, you can change out the barrel,
loli phabay
May 2013
#13
That's some crazy shit , I don't own a gun but would have done something drastic myself
newmember
May 2013
#26
he shot and killed a dangerous animal, thats what one does to protect ones livestock or pets or pers
loli phabay
May 2013
#30
well if the dog already killed other animals and attacked his dog and him as he says then yes
loli phabay
May 2013
#39
depends, if the dog had already attacked then came on his property then he shot it.
loli phabay
May 2013
#47
you did the right thing if he couldnt destroy it. rule number one though is the three s's
loli phabay
May 2013
#121
you did the right thing, you have a right to defend your pets and livestock and yourself
loli phabay
May 2013
#23
So you put down a dog that was a threat to others, and you are getting hammered for it?
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#111
Since you used the word compromise, what is the gun control side willing to give up?
aikoaiko
May 2013
#22
You shoot dogs, don't you? Should there be a license required for that?
SammyWinstonJack
May 2013
#46
You would not be saying this stuff if it was You and your that was being attacked
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#112
Animal Control in many parts of the country would come out and shoot it.
Lady Freedom Returns
May 2013
#116
100% background checks for ALL transfers. I'm on board with that. Forget ballistics testing.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2013
#79
Thanks, BWB, good post. This gun owner supports 100% background checks, limited magazines ...
Scuba
May 2013
#106