Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound is NOT a 'jelly on the belly' sonogram. [View all]joshcryer
(62,269 posts)15. And what if we like it?
j/k, j/k, I also liked that idea, it was epic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So essentially they have legalized rape by device as long as the woman has an unwanted pregnancy?
YellowRubberDuckie
Feb 2012
#6
LOL! I'm not in Texas but I would gladly fly down to help you whip some asses if tht is FORCIBLY
Ecumenist
Feb 2012
#48
My cervical cancer was treated in a teaching hospital, usually with a large audience
REP
Feb 2012
#35
Yeah, that's very true, but they don't care about embryonic or fetal development.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#14
If a woman isn't very far along, she probably wouldn't be able to see much on a regular ultrasound
Nikia
Feb 2012
#26
when i had my oldest son, they had to onitor him. i am sure it was not exactly the same but
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#39