General Discussion

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)

22. Right There With Him

Tue Apr 30, 2013, 12:58 AM

Apr 2013

Not only that I'm sorry, there are parts of the official 9/11 narrative that don't add up. Just one is that we're supposed to believe that these guys trained a couple of times, on a little Cessna, were mediocre with that, and then were able to precisely maneuver a huge jet airliner at much higher than recommended speed. Jet pilots speaking out question whether they could even find the right location from up there. Oh and I've flown a lot, I've never seen flights like this with so few passengers listed.

There's more that doesn't add up, the best not nutty site I've seen is here http://911research.wtc7.net/

Links to articles in newspapers, etc on about everything there. Something was and is rotten about the whole thing.

Whatever the truth is, it was no excuse to invade a country that had zero do do with it. Laura should be baking cakes with files in them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dave Zirin: I Keep Wondering WHY George W Bush Is NOT ON TRIAL FOR WAR CRIMES? [View all] Segami Apr 2013 OP

Perhaps the answer is that Obama and his team saw what had been done, agreed with it, and byeya Apr 2013 #1

And don't forget Nancy Pelosi. From Day 1 as Speaker in Jan. 07, she said that impeachment Cal33 Apr 2013 #29

kick and rec, because I am wondering that too. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2013 #2

Obama's retirement plan does not include doing things that the international super-rich don't want. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #3

Because ever since Reagan edhopper Apr 2013 #4

This is a pertinent question that beleaguers me as well! WHY? Newest Reality Apr 2013 #5

That may be the first time the question's been asked on an ABCNNBCBSFauxnoisenutwork program. Octafish Apr 2013 #6

Why Indeed SamKnause Apr 2013 #7

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2013 #8

Most likely because the criminal connection is so widespread. Bush was just the figurehead. Gregorian Apr 2013 #9

Why? Why? Why? OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #10

Not sure we would be ready to handle the answers to these starkly pertinent indepat Apr 2013 #21

people perpetuating the bush 2 agenda are not likely to prosecute for doing the same thing nt msongs Apr 2013 #11

There are 'laws' for the few and then there are 'laws' for the many. Segami Apr 2013 #14

Obama says he is a GOOD man. robinlynne Apr 2013 #12

Everyone in Washington is purchased. That's why. HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #13

He won't indict Wall Street criminals, zeeland Apr 2013 #15

Tried, Convicted, And 1ProudAtheist Apr 2013 #16

It seems you have Hula Popper Apr 2013 #18

I Believe That 1ProudAtheist Apr 2013 #19

it's hard to prosecute Bully Taw Apr 2013 #17

most conspiracies aren't to *do* any particular thing, they're more about maintaining a status quo MisterP Apr 2013 #20

Right There With Him colsohlibgal Apr 2013 #22

Excellent piece + discussion! nt Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #23

It's sad to remember that we once thought that was possible, that all we had to do was sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #24

How do we get elections with instant run offs? ReasonableToo Apr 2013 #25

Because we want a peaceful transfer of power. GreenStormCloud Apr 2013 #26

To borrow from Orwell: deutsey Apr 2013 #27

standing by and watching a rape without trying to stop it would draw significant indignation here DrDan Apr 2013 #28

Zirin starts in earnest right at the 7 min marker. :) nt LaydeeBug Apr 2013 #30