Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
33. LOL. Using false data is not a "typo".
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 02:23 PM
Apr 2013

Let's review. You cite a non-peer reviewed "study" by non-scientists, using false data, and even after you know the people are right-wing ideologues with no credentials, the "study" is just a propaganda piece that doesn't even attempt to do any statistical testing, and the data that the study is based on is false -- you're still defending it.

Perfection!

The problem gun reformers face [View all] ProSense Apr 2013 OP
The bottom line is that pipoman Apr 2013 #1
No, that's not the "bottom line" ProSense Apr 2013 #2
Another false NRA talking point. They just keep flowing... DanTex Apr 2013 #3
"talking point" "talking point" pipoman Apr 2013 #4
Maybe look into why nobody with a clue about constitutional law has even hinted that DanTex Apr 2013 #5
Dan, are you not aware of the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution? Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #9
Are you not aware of the NFA, which requires intra-state sales between private citizens to be DanTex Apr 2013 #17
Would you quit scaring billh58 Apr 2013 #23
Dan, intra-state sales between private citizens already gets a background check. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #41
Intra-state means within the same state. DanTex Apr 2013 #44
What provision of the NFA governs sales within the same state? Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #49
If you sell an NFA gun to someone within the same state, you need to transfer the registration. DanTex Apr 2013 #56
Dan, I'll ask again. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #60
So are you saying I'm wrong? That's a serious question. DanTex Apr 2013 #64
Dan, all I'm asking you to do is prove your claim. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #73
I'm not sure what you are trying to argue here. DanTex Apr 2013 #74
Ain't it tough splainin to folks who can't get their "nomenclature" correct. Hoyt Apr 2013 #53
Hoyt, I dont' actually know the difference between a magazine and a clip. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #55
Guns are far from "progressive." Hoyt Apr 2013 #68
You don't think that the right of self-defense is a progressive value? Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #71
The right of self-defense and the right to own a gun are different things. DanTex Apr 2013 #72
I don't recall seeing a Constitutional Amendment that guarantees you to be free from gun violence. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #75
The constitution also doesn't say anything about self-defense either. DanTex Apr 2013 #76
Are you a 100 pound woman? Typical gun cultist BS. Hoyt Apr 2013 #80
Instead of insulting me, why don't you address the point I raised? Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #81
I could put a bunch of photos of shot kids, give us a break and stop promoting more guns. Hoyt Apr 2013 #87
And the weapons restricted under NFA pipoman Apr 2013 #54
Whether guns are in common use or not has nothing to do with commerce clause or states' rights. DanTex Apr 2013 #58
It has everything to do with NFA registry... pipoman Apr 2013 #61
The "NFA Registry" is not part of the constitution. DanTex Apr 2013 #65
Dan, so basically what you're saying is that because the Fed regulates machines guns one way... Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #78
Constitutionally, yes. DanTex Apr 2013 #79
Dan, let's get real here. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #82
You are confusing the commerce clause and the second amendment. DanTex Apr 2013 #83
No, I didn't! Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #84
OK, I think this is where I hop off the crazy train. DanTex Apr 2013 #85
No, all I'm asking is that you prove your claim. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #90
The ONLY reason that the NFA pipoman Apr 2013 #88
About the constitutional scholar thing. DanTex Apr 2013 #47
So then why didn't it happen praytell? pipoman Apr 2013 #57
Umm, because there weren't enough votes in the senate. DanTex Apr 2013 #59
How do we explain the several Democrats who didn't vote for it? pipoman Apr 2013 #62
They are right-wing Dems like Max Baucus. DanTex Apr 2013 #67
Now, let's be specific: NRAtalkingPoint™ No. 20358 Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #6
In other words, nobody with a clue has any doubts about the constitutionality. DanTex Apr 2013 #7
So the ACLU has gone over to the Dark Side? Eleanors38 Apr 2013 #8
The ACLU didn't say it was unconstitutional. DanTex Apr 2013 #13
Dan, a national gun registry is prohibited by law. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #10
Wow, you guys don't even know about NFA! Fascinating! DanTex Apr 2013 #12
Yes, I am aware of it... Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #43
That wouldn't affect the commerce clause or the Federal Government's jurisdiction. DanTex Apr 2013 #45
No, it would. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #51
Miller was a second amendment case. The "unusualness" matters to the second amendment, DanTex Apr 2013 #52
Where is this registry? former9thward Apr 2013 #11
LOL. So not only do you not know what a "Harvard Study" is, you also don't know about the NFA. DanTex Apr 2013 #14
I thought the NFA was a registry for certain firearms, like machine guns, premium Apr 2013 #15
I didn't say "all firearms". But the NFA is most definitely a national gun registry. DanTex Apr 2013 #16
Thanks for the reply. premium Apr 2013 #18
Of course, not of all firearms. DanTex Apr 2013 #21
I tend to agree with you, premium Apr 2013 #22
You never know what Scalia and Co are going to do, but DanTex Apr 2013 #25
Except there is no way to register existing guns using the NFA model hack89 Apr 2013 #39
NFA 1934 umt9 Apr 2013 #35
Thanks. premium Apr 2013 #42
Has it never ever prevented 1 criminal? Poor logic. Since one is able to get an illegal weapon.... uppityperson Apr 2013 #46
Re-read my post umt9 May 2013 #92
LOL. former9thward Apr 2013 #19
The percentages don't affect the constitutionality question. DanTex Apr 2013 #20
I am still waiting for you to disprove one fact presented in that study. former9thward Apr 2013 #30
Amazing, you're still standing by it! Even after it was shown to you that it is right-wing DanTex Apr 2013 #31
Wow a typo! former9thward Apr 2013 #32
LOL. Using false data is not a "typo". DanTex Apr 2013 #33
That dog don't hunt any more. upaloopa Apr 2013 #26
It only takes one person to challenge and you can bet on that person being out there somewhere.. pipoman Apr 2013 #63
It also takes money and a court willing to hear it upaloopa Apr 2013 #77
The money will be there through lobbying groups like NRA pipoman Apr 2013 #89
No it isn't Progressive dog Apr 2013 #66
thye unsolvable problem actually is : we already have 200 million guns librechik Apr 2013 #24
Your last few words billh58 Apr 2013 #28
Yep. Zoeisright Apr 2013 #69
From the article... rrneck Apr 2013 #27
So the GOP is counting on the ignorance of the American people. DanTex Apr 2013 #29
Nothing but falsehoods. former9thward Apr 2013 #34
Uh huh. "There's no loophole". Where have we heard that talking point before? DanTex Apr 2013 #36
Why did you post falsehoods? former9thward Apr 2013 #37
I think everyone outside the NRA bubble understands that you are the one posting falsehoods. DanTex Apr 2013 #38
a "friendly top"? former9thward Apr 2013 #40
"Loophole" pipoman Apr 2013 #91
Yes. rrneck Apr 2013 #48
Maybe their problem is the outright contempt that they have for millions of Democrats and AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #50
Speaking of NRA propaganda billh58 Apr 2013 #70
The problem they face: Goobers rustydog Apr 2013 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The problem gun reformers...»Reply #33