Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For those who believe the President supports chained CPI [View all]Blanks
(4,835 posts)44. There are certain things that we should be entitled to.
Food is the most important among them IMHO.
I'm saying that the only way to make certain that people have food is to give them food.
If your grocery budget is $100/week and when they ring it up at the store; it is $120, you don't have enough money. We need a program that guarantees that people have as much food as they need, money doesn't get us there.
Making petty digs about my priorities may seem clever, but the fact is the system isn't working. We know that because what we keep hearing is that a couple of bucks a month can make the difference between someone eating and someone starving - that sounds like a broken system to me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Agreed. It should not be on the table. If they want to preserve SS, raise the cap.
still_one
Apr 2013
#2
Do you know what obtuse means? Obama proposed this, he supports his proposal.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#12
He specifically promised not to cut using a change in cpi. your bullshit is just that
Dragonfli
Apr 2013
#36
It is like arguing with a kindergarten class that thinks Pete the custodian is Pan and can fly
Dragonfli
Apr 2013
#54
The Bush White House called lowering polution standards their "Blue Skies Initiative".
Marr
Apr 2013
#48
The rich will all still be rich. Most SS recipients will go sick and hungry. That is not "balanced."
forestpath
Apr 2013
#9
Wow, an increase starting at age 76, phased in over 10 years. Av life expectancy 78.2
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#10
That is heading in the wrong direction, most don't live that long, typically the wealthy
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#18
"If grandma needs food, then drag your lazy ass over to her house and give her some food."
cthulu2016
Apr 2013
#39
That's exactly the message the elite use in pushing these cuts, and exactly where we were before FDR
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#40