Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Peas for old folks: Three months of meals, disappeared each year. Hunger. [View all]indepat
(20,899 posts)43. Those two gentlemen pictured with our president can go take a flying fuck at the
moon and themselves as lagniappe and shame on our president for buying into their right-wing load of smelly shitty dung dressed as balanced when it's pure depraved right-wing hockey.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Peas for old folks: Three months of meals, disappeared each year. Hunger. [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2013
OP
No he won't. He'll be rewarded for this choice. Bank on it, he certainly is.
SammyWinstonJack
Apr 2013
#31
I will certainly never be bullied into voting against my better judgement again, ever.
Mnemosyne
Apr 2013
#4
And that's a substitution (pebbles for peas), so it doesn't indicate a rise in the CPI anymore.
dawg
Apr 2013
#48
Why, exactly, does he have "no choice but to negotiate with" Teabaggers?
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#19
Truth is.... they can already afford to buy all the planes and yachts and houses they want...
world wide wally
Apr 2013
#16
worse-- they want to pauperize the middle class to have more people to look down on
carolinayellowdog
Apr 2013
#52
Vague, capricious, arbitrary and unspecified promises of "protections" are unacceptable.
bvar22
Apr 2013
#24
The pissy trivial amount of extra income for the lowest quintile of beneficiaries--
eridani
Apr 2013
#33
The people who will be 'protected' are already going without proper food and medicines because
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#42
One of the nice things about Senator Durbin is that if you are a constituent, he'll write back.
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#21
It wasn't too long ago when Pelosi was saying the planned chained-CPI wasn't a cut.
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#38
On the Catfood Commission, Durbin voted to eventually reduce the average SS benefit by 22%
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2013
#29
His more-accurate argument is, for me, a new one. Of course, he's not running for re-election.
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#37
Presumably you've already asked the sonofabitch what the insulin substitute is supposed to be? n/t
eridani
Apr 2013
#35
No, but that's a good question. I wonder. If a person eats less, do they require less insulin?
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#36
Those two gentlemen pictured with our president can go take a flying fuck at the
indepat
Apr 2013
#43