Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Obama? [View all]
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
4. Ahem.
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 10:52 PM
Apr 2013
Corporate Profits Have Grown By 171 Percent Under Obama -- Highest Rate Since 1900
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/corporate-profits-have-grown-171-percent-under-obama-highest-rate-1900

"Average annual corporate profit growth under Obama is the highest since 1900, whereas profit growth declined during both Bush presidencies. As a share of the economy, corporate profits have never been higher.
Unfortunately, this profit deluge has not been shared by workers, whose wages as a percentage of the economy have fallen to all-time lows. Workers also got dinged by the recent increase in the payroll tax, which was large enough to wipe out a minimum wage increase in some states."


8 Huge Corporate Handouts in the Fiscal Cliff Bill

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/8-huge-corporate-handouts-fiscal-cliff-bill

"Throughout the months of November and December, a steady stream of corporate CEOs flowed in and out of the White House to discuss the impending fiscal cliff. Many of them, such as Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, would then publicly come out and talk about how modest increases of tax rates on the wealthy were reasonable in order to deal with the deficit problem. What wasn’t mentioned is what these leaders wanted, which is what’s known as “tax extenders”, or roughly $205B of tax breaks for corporations. With such a banal name, and boring and difficult to read line items in the bill, few political operatives have bothered to pay attention to this part of the bill. But it is critical to understanding what is going on.

5) Subsidies for Goldman Sachs Headquarters – Sec. 328 extends 'tax exempt financing for York Liberty Zone,' which was a program to provide post-9/11 recovery funds. Rather than going to small businesses affected, however, this was, according to Bloomberg, 'little more than a subsidy for fancy Manhattan apartments and office towers for Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Corp.' Michael Bloomberg himself actually thought the program was excessive, so that’s saying something. According to David Cay Johnston’s The Fine Print, Goldman got $1.6 billion in tax free financing for its new massive headquarters through Liberty Bonds."


The Untouchables: How the Obama administration protected Wall Street from prosecutions

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/23/untouchables-wall-street-prosecutions-obama

Yes, Virginia, the Rich Continue to Get Richer: the Top 1% Got 121% of Income Gains Since 2009

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/02/yes-virginia-the-rich-continue-to-get-richer-the-1-got-121-of-income-gains-since-2009.html

U.S. banks in 2012 post highest profits since '06
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/us-usa-fdic-earnings-idUSBRE91P0N820130226?utm_source=Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=de8376aab3-DD_2_27_132_27_2013&utm_medium=email#.US5jjkXSlU8.twitter

This Year’s Subsidy to Wall Street = the Amount of This Year’s Sequester Cuts
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/02/this-years-subsidy-to-wall-street-the-amount-of-this-years-sequester-cuts.html#.US_yiFwwnHY.facebook

Don’t Blink, or You’ll Miss Another Bailout
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100466032

America faces more than a dozen deadlines, all caused by billionaires and wealth transfer
http://americablog.com/2013/02/america-faces-more-than-a-dozen-deadlines-all-caused-by-billionaires-and-wealth-transfer.html

Bank Bailout 2: Obama Lets Mortgage Abusers Off the Hook
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/02/09-5

via:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022445620
Obama? [View all] XemaSab Apr 2013 OP
You left out "Spawn of Satan". Common Sense Party Apr 2013 #1
LOL! PennsylvaniaMatt Apr 2013 #21
Somewhere in between would probably be more like it for me. Jamastiene Apr 2013 #2
None of the above... one_voice Apr 2013 #3
Ahem. Fire Walk With Me Apr 2013 #4
+10000 woo me with science Apr 2013 #14
+1001 forestpath Apr 2013 #17
I could throw up. tblue Apr 2013 #15
Mine either forestpath Apr 2013 #18
People do not yet seem to understand that Obama is not a Democrat, or a Democratic president. Fire Walk With Me Apr 2013 #22
movement to steal social security through this chained CPI... MrMickeysMom Apr 2013 #5
He doesn't care at all duffyduff Apr 2013 #6
The elite have never had a better friend in the White House. nt Demo_Chris Apr 2013 #7
You got it right. 840high Apr 2013 #8
NO NO NO blkmusclmachine Apr 2013 #9
mixed review SmileyRose Apr 2013 #10
PLEASE! Do not try to pass this man off cbrer Apr 2013 #11
Leaving lots to be desired. Meh. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #12
His lack of patchouli prohibition troubles me, but other than that... Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #13
It would have been interesting to see this poll in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 TimberValley Apr 2013 #16
unless you're a "loyalist" Skittles Apr 2013 #19
I voted awesome PennsylvaniaMatt Apr 2013 #20
Look at all those Pro Leftys! Rex Apr 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama?»Reply #4