Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jonathan Turley is a Liar! Thanks to DU, I Caught The Fucker! [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)23. It's not a *requirement*, but it's an *option*. So I ask again
are you claiming that the NDAA does not authorize indefinite imprisonment of US citizens?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I did too. He should be careful doing that to an old man that's already on the edge. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#65
That's out of date. I just looked at the conference report in the Cong Record beginning at H8356.
struggle4progress
Dec 2011
#57
Can you explain the existing law or authorities on the topic of unlimited detention
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#81
The existing law should be changed as I understand it. Codifying existing law
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#86
So you're OK with indefinite imprisonment of US citizens with zero judicial recourse?
MannyGoldstein
Dec 2011
#17
So are you claiming that the NDAA does not authorize indefinite imprisonment of US citizens
MannyGoldstein
Dec 2011
#19
Yup, says it isn't a requirement and then in another sub-section it punts it back to
TheKentuckian
Dec 2011
#33
forget about Ron Paul, Suddenly Turley has gone off the deep end, did you view Turley in this light
2banon
Dec 2011
#27
But, but, but this president is a Democrat. How could you even think to question a Democrat?
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#61
"The plurality held that judges need not be involved in reviewing these cases, ...
MannyGoldstein
Dec 2011
#45
Thank you. That's an important point. Seems to me that means the president
rhett o rick
Dec 2011
#63
Turley clearly likes Paul better than any other candidate. They share an anti-regulatory agenda,
struggle4progress
Dec 2011
#52
thank you..it's a great thing that here on DU we always have people who can explain why we did not
Douglas Carpenter
Dec 2011
#78