Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,764 posts)

12. That would be easier if you tried disagreeing substantively.

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 05:28 PM

Feb 2013

You know, provided an actual *reason* you disagree?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Obama's Sequester?' Pure Nonsense [View all] mfcorey1 Feb 2013 OP

The facts do not matter in the least. djean111 Feb 2013 #9

Um, bullshit? gcomeau Feb 2013 #4

But guaranteeing spending cuts was the deal badtoworse Feb 2013 #5

You know what the sequester does, right? -eom gcomeau Feb 2013 #6

There is no way to cut spending without pain somewhere,... badtoworse Feb 2013 #7

umm... ok. gcomeau Feb 2013 #8

We'll just have to disagree about this. badtoworse Feb 2013 #10

That would be easier if you tried disagreeing substantively. gcomeau Feb 2013 #12

Try this badtoworse Feb 2013 #13

I repeat. Bullshit. gcomeau Feb 2013 #14

they built it napkinz Feb 2013 #11

The scam was bipartisan from the start. woo me with science Feb 2013 #15