Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Big K&R gollygee Feb 2013 #1
So, of course that means all their bonuses are taxpayer money as well n2doc Feb 2013 #2
Congress wants to go after earned benefits to cut costs AndyA Feb 2013 #3
Exactly correct !!! Maineman Feb 2013 #11
WELFARE QUEENS! Cosmocat Feb 2013 #20
How can you pick on those poor, dear welfare queens - I mean Tsiyu Feb 2013 #4
Gee, thank goodness that big bailout was done. We are all so much better for it. Safetykitten Feb 2013 #5
My understanding is that its not exactly a subsidy, and has little to do with taxpayers bhikkhu Feb 2013 #6
You're sort of right, but not in a good way. Jerry442 Feb 2013 #16
GIVE IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Voice for Peace Feb 2013 #7
Lol the comments on bloomberg... DireStrike Feb 2013 #8
We can't begrudge their wealth. Now, eat your peas. nt OnyxCollie Feb 2013 #9
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2013 #10
K&R So what if we told you, and have been telling you this, since 2009? Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #12
Very well said Thug. xtraxritical Feb 2013 #23
THE TRUTH IS NOT PRETTY mettamega Feb 2013 #13
These thefts are publicly available data . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #14
Speaking of welfare queens. And Teapublicans want to invest SSI funds with these fraudsters. marble falls Feb 2013 #15
The TeaBaggers, of course, have been massively suckered Berlum Feb 2013 #37
All the more reason to nationalize the banks. nt 2naSalit Feb 2013 #17
I'm for nationalizing everything, no kidding. Just call me a... freshwest Feb 2013 #29
... 2naSalit Feb 2013 #46
Surprise! Surprise! Demeter Feb 2013 #18
But, but, sputter, sputter, if we don't make the banks rich by screwing taxpayers we will have jtuck004 Feb 2013 #19
That's strange. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #32
That one is kind of lost when used on me, because I come from a time when people could jtuck004 Feb 2013 #34
Prosperity for them, austerity for us. nt deminks Feb 2013 #21
Exactly wrong !!!!! econoclast Feb 2013 #22
It seems to me that we pay interest on the debt... Blanks Feb 2013 #27
........... Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #38
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2013 #24
This was a heist started under Bush.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #25
Gee! Who could have guessed? bvar22 Feb 2013 #26
THAT's the kind of news that once was covered by the Labor desk. Octafish Feb 2013 #31
The banksters should all thank the politicians who arranged to transfer the hundreds of billions AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #28
Give 'em all a big bonus. Octafish Feb 2013 #30
K&R Sherman A1 Feb 2013 #33
Does it occur to anyone... cbrer Feb 2013 #35
Republican Socialism Berlum Feb 2013 #36
It's more Replublican Communism, and only the 1%'rs are allowed in the Commune. harun Feb 2013 #44
+1 patrice Feb 2013 #51
Let them fail next time and there will be a next time Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #39
"So three cents out of every tax dollar the government collects from you is pocketed by the 1%" Wednesdays Feb 2013 #40
This subsidy to the banks should be a CAMPAIGN ISSUE FOR 2014 and especially 2016. DhhD Feb 2013 #41
So if we tax them more, they'll get richer? aquart Feb 2013 #42
Limiting their competitive advantage weakens the country’s position in global finance? benld74 Feb 2013 #43
This is all the Democrats and Republicans fault. nt limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #45
They're fucking us. It's only a matter of finding out how much and where. n/t Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #47
Basically just like the health industry cilla4progress Feb 2013 #48
Too Big To Jail blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #49
kr HiPointDem Feb 2013 #50
I know! Let's cut Social Security! woo me with science Feb 2013 #52
Fascism American style. fasttense Feb 2013 #53
This guy actually had it right... Benton D Struckcheon Feb 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Explosive Bloomberg Edito...»Reply #50