General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Maddow: MSNBC Special on Iraq WMD Will "Upset" Many [View all]idwiyo
(5,113 posts)There was no fucking Boolean proposition. There was "prove the negative" that Shrub and Toni kept insisting on, and if you have even an ounce of integrity in YOUR body you'd know it for what it was.
There were reports by UN inspectors who were saying that chances that Saddam had WMDs were so low as to be laughable.
There was "yellow cake" bullshit
Did you conveniently forgot about Downing Street Memo? Or are You going to tell me only 2 people were privy to it contents?
Bush-Aznar memo?
Iraq dossier?
Your fucking piece of shit Colin Powell masterful performance in UN?
Moronic pictures of fuck really knows what that "I" was told to believe we're mobile weapons labs? Even so experts were saying it was extremely unlikely?
Hysterical statements by Ahmed Chalabi?
This is just a top of the iceberg. If anyone of your or mine politicians wanted to make sure they knew what was going on, they could. They decided not to because their political feature was more important to them than starting a war of aggression based of fake premise.
I repeat my statement: every single one of them who voted for that war is a war criminal.
If YOU had a progressive bone in YOUR body, you would know there were no hard facts presented before that war. None. Nada. Zilch.
There were allegations that didn't bear scrutiny.
There were appeals to patriotism.
There were statements based on hearsay (Chalabi and others comes to mind)
There were shitload of demands to prove negative.
That's bloody it.
NOTHING ELSE.
But go ahead, keep insisting that some of your politicians are whiter than white and were against it before they were for it if it makes you feel better.