Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lurker Deluxe

(1,036 posts)
9. Is that how it went?
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:38 PM
Feb 2013

Motor Vessel Triumph, Motor Vessel Triumph, this is a mayday, this is a mayday, we have lost main engine power and we are adrift.

Acknowledged Triumph, this is the Mexican Navy and we will tow you to port and then perform a close inspection of your craft.

Are you saying that before they passengers were rescued the goal of the Mexican Navy was to punish Carnival?

Also, which way was the current flowing? Seeming that the vessel was not moving toward Mexico I would say it was moving north east. And which way was the wind blowing, I know they had a tail wind coming into Mobile Bay.

Perhaps they made the best decision at the time.

Putting your hatred of Carnival aside, perhaps the safety of the passengers was a concern and all options were carefully looked at, including the difficulties of getting 4000 people out of Mexico.

The FED waives the requirement for "closed loop travel" -- i.e. elehhhhna Feb 2013 #1
So it's legal? babylonsister Feb 2013 #2
Perfectly legal jberryhill Feb 2013 #13
no, blame the cruise company --they could let the folks with passports off CreekDog Feb 2013 #6
a minor fire? Lurker Deluxe Feb 2013 #10
right because, as before a small fire which didn't do damage to all the engines CreekDog Feb 2013 #11
Which one before? Lurker Deluxe Feb 2013 #12
in 2012, 2010, 1999...all on Carnival owned ships CreekDog Feb 2013 #25
Cause they knew there was going to be an engine room fire nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #8
Is that how it went? Lurker Deluxe Feb 2013 #9
For a cruise or driving into Canada RandiFan1290 Feb 2013 #3
Loop cruises are an exception jberryhill Feb 2013 #14
It possible no passport required if they stayed aboard, HooptieWagon Feb 2013 #4
Mexico was willing to work with passengers nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #5
Thank you. babylonsister Feb 2013 #7
The actual law is this... jberryhill Feb 2013 #15
The passport card was developed in response to the tammywammy Feb 2013 #16
Nope, passports was not the issue nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #17
So.. Lurker Deluxe Feb 2013 #19
Took about 13 seconds to find ...... oldhippie Feb 2013 #18
The problem wasn't Mexico willing to work with the passengers ....... oldhippie Feb 2013 #21
The law really should be changed to require passports whether it is closed loop or not davidpdx Feb 2013 #26
Huh, when I went to Alaska, we had to have passports to disembark in Canada. Cleita Feb 2013 #20
Mexico requires them. nadinbrzezinski Feb 2013 #22
Wrong again oldhippie Feb 2013 #24
Mexico allows US passport cards for entry. tammywammy Feb 2013 #23
send complaints to the Bahamas quadrature Feb 2013 #27
What do the Bahamas have to do with ..... oldhippie Feb 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Carnival-did anyone wonde...»Reply #9