General Discussion

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)

16. Then why did they impede the fire department from quenching the fire?

Reply to Historic NY (Reply #2)

Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:14 PM

Feb 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Law Enforcement and Media Covered Up the Plan to Burn Christopher Dorner Alive [View all] Gentle-man Feb 2013 OP

Waco 2013 JaneyVee Feb 2013 #1

Symbionese Liberation Army killed by burning by the LAPD in 1974. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #40

Burner = hot tear gas canister.... Historic NY Feb 2013 #2

Then why did they impede the fire department from quenching the fire? Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #16

They won't let them come up until they're sure Light House Feb 2013 #23

And by "safe", you mean a dead suspect? Because a live suspect wouldn't be safe. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #25

Not necessarily dead, Light House Feb 2013 #26

Please remember that PD had been shooting to kill from the very beginning. 64 bullets unloaded Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #29

But remember, Light House Feb 2013 #31

Yeah, let's wait for the "official" investigation, because that's ALWAYS the truth, right? Th1onein Feb 2013 #57

Because he had lots of ammunition. Fire + ammunition = bad. DevonRex Feb 2013 #33

Because fire fighters don't wear bullet proof vests. dkf Feb 2013 #58

Yeah ok, at an active shooter situation... Historic NY Feb 2013 #60

10-4 heaven05 Feb 2013 #36

I doubt they meant tear gas when they said burner. nm rhett o rick Feb 2013 #45

The article says that it is THERMITE -- an INCENDIARY DEVICE Th1onein Feb 2013 #55

Meanwhile the Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #3

False. And you are smart enough to know that. dbackjon Feb 2013 #4

I didn't have the scanner channel up during the execution, but I did see several Twitter Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #12

What's the purpose behind your post? What's the point? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #5

Linking a story from a reputable source and reporter. Cooley Hurd Feb 2013 #7

You dont find it significant that a person on the scene wrote wqhat he saw, and that is what he saw? robinlynne Feb 2013 #8

On the scene? brooklynite Feb 2013 #10

He was listening to radios on the scene, with the police. robinlynne Feb 2013 #49

I find it more significant that there has been a ton of stuff reported on this story.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #44

As several posters pointed out, Dorner had no LAPD badge. robinlynne Feb 2013 #50

And they know this how, exactly? Did they read it on the Internet? nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #52

Dorner was fired in 2009. robinlynne Feb 2013 #53

seems obvious heaven05 Feb 2013 #38

See my post #44. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #48

I guess it is a sigh of the times that you ask that question. zeemike Feb 2013 #46

Wow. Read my post #44. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #51

Link to this exchange/audio here... jmg257 Feb 2013 #6

Man says there is corruption in LAPD. sheriffs burn him alive and attempt to cover it up. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #9

You do know that the term "burner" refers to a type of tear gas, don't you? Light House Feb 2013 #11

They emit flames, don't they. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #13

Yes they do, Light House Feb 2013 #17

Would using seven of them on a small, wooden cabin constitute extreme negligence Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #24

Possibly. Light House Feb 2013 #30

It is still an execution. Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #32

I disagree respectfully. Light House Feb 2013 #34

You do know that there's audio of cops yelling "burn this motherf*cker", right? Gentle-man Feb 2013 #14

Yes I do know. Light House Feb 2013 #19

lol, so creative Gentle-man Feb 2013 #20

Were you there? Light House Feb 2013 #22

“Burn that fucking house down!” Luminous Animal Feb 2013 #27

We'll just have to disagree. Light House Feb 2013 #37

yeah heaven05 Feb 2013 #42

Not quite understanding your post. Light House Feb 2013 #47

I heaven05 Feb 2013 #39

I agree. Light House Feb 2013 #41

so is the owner of the cabin going to get a new one at sheriffs' expense? nt msongs Feb 2013 #15

Absolutely! Of course! Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #18

I would imagine so. robinlynne Feb 2013 #54

If one takes a poor strategic view I suppose they could come up with this mythology Feb 2013 #21

Media are beholden to the people, not the state. And how odd you choose to overlook Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #28

Thank you. liberalmuse Feb 2013 #43

+100 nt Mojorabbit Feb 2013 #59

The "State" always resorts to violence. Dyedinthewoolliberal Feb 2013 #35

Recommend jsr Feb 2013 #56

Scanners are allot of fun... ReRe Feb 2013 #61

Locking. Son of Gob Feb 2013 #62