Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
10. I read that very statement at least once this morning
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 06:06 PM
Feb 2013

No, I don't have the link, and I'm presuming it was in jest, but there was no indication of humor, and it certainly wasn't sarcasm. The words would not be an exact match, very close though, so indeed such has been posted on this subject, and the OP is not at all off base.

Even if posted in jest, I don't think it wise to go there. It helps legitimize the whole drone thing, implying that it's ok if the target is vile enough.

edited to add:
OK, I back-tracked on the threads I read, and it wasn't in a Dorner thread, it was in a Nugent thread. The post was pretty clearly in jest, even though it didn't say so. I wouldn't post such a thing for the reasons stated above, but no big deal, and no bad vibes on my behalf to the person who posted it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: Dorner - It does not ...»Reply #10