General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Daniel Ellsberg: “They are reversing freedoms we’ve had since the Magna Carta.” [View all]Catherina
(35,568 posts)Thanks for the additional details.
Wasserman, Nancy, and Ronnie hobnobbing like old times.
...
MCA was the heavy hitter in the negotiations, having purchased the rights to Paramounts pre-1948 library and supposedly engaged in talks for Universals. The decision was made to call Reagan back to the ranks, presumably in hopes that he could sway MCA and Wasserman toward a better deal for the actors. As Reagan recalled in his memoir, he didnt want to return to the SAG presidency, as his career had suffered during his last tenure. But he called Wasserman (still, remember, his agent), and Wasserman advised him to buck up and take the job.
UM. ARE YOU GUYS SMELLING SOMETHING FISHY? Maybe some high-class, bastard fish that eats all the other, small, eager fishes and then pretends its the nicest fish in the pond?
Reagan fails to manufacture a deal that satisfied the guild members; they go on strike. For six weeks. Everyones pissed and anxious. Finally, he cuts a deal: The studios would put together a pension/welfare plan of sorts for the actors, and in exchange, the actors would give over ALL RIGHTS to ALL FILMS made before 1960. It was a mindbogglingly good deal for the studios, and a huge eff-you to the actors. And that, Scandals readers, is what they call screwing the pooch.
To add insult to injury, Reagan resigned from the SAG presidency in order to move into a joint production partnership with you guessed it MCA. When the United States government summoned a grand jury to investigate MCAs monopolistic business practices in 1962, Reagan was called to the stand. In his testimony, sealed for 25 years, he admitted that he had been cut into a 25% ownership deal of General Electric Theater in ... wait for it ... 1959, after discussions with Wasserman.
...
Without Reagan and the policies he pushed through at Wasserman's behest, there would be no Rupert Murdoch or at least no News Corp. the way we know it. No massive Disney empire. Six entities would not provide the vast majority of your entertainment. The media landscape could conceivably look much different more diverse, and less obsessed with synergy and cross-plugging and multi-platform hits. Whether in 1947, 1952, 1959, or 1984, Reagans interests were Wassermans interests and those interests were very rarely the interests of the citizens Reagan was entrusted to protect.
...
http://thehairpin.com/2012/11/scandals-of-classic-hollywood-ronald-reagan-plays-the-president