Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In 10 years CBO expects the number of people on social security to increase by 40% [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)43. I would love to see your sources for the calculation. In any case the answer is easy.
I wouldnt doubt that the "trust fund" might be running low because Bush, I believe, reduced the revenue by lowering the cap. We need to raise the cap.
We need to raise the cap. Repeat after me, WE NEED TO RAISE THE CAP and not cut services.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In 10 years CBO expects the number of people on social security to increase by 40% [View all]
dkf
Feb 2013
OP
Huge future problem that will drown out all the investment and much of the safety net.
dkf
Feb 2013
#4
And a good portion of the investment is from pension funds and 401(K)s which belong to
JDPriestly
Feb 2013
#7
I do not fear his "intent". I have confidence that I can refute or ignore as needed.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#20
Your breathless defense of the Bush tax cuts can be easily found in the archives
RandiFan1290
Feb 2013
#19
You miss the point...if we had stayed on the path Clinton had set up for us, our situation would be
dkf
Feb 2013
#23
So your point is that if we had done stuff differently in the past, we wouldnt be focked now?
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#31
I would love to see your sources for the calculation. In any case the answer is easy.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#43
And to think that there were some folks here who wanted the payroll tax holiday extended yet again
bluestateguy
Feb 2013
#10
And that's why the Greenspan commission decided we should pay extra to provide a cushion.
pa28
Feb 2013
#14
I agree completely. Having a "trust fund" is only a temptation for spending.
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#21
The purpose of the "trust fund" was to have extra money to pay the baby boomer
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#30
That's exactly what happened and we gen x'ers helped. Part of the social contract.
pa28
Feb 2013
#41
Of course we dont put the SS revenue in a box until we need it. But we do keep track
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#42
I knew you would catch on. "Cut Social Security benefits now, so we dont have to cut them in the
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#45
I might be wrong but arent they leading up to suggesting "targeted" euthanasia?
rhett o rick
Feb 2013
#34