Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
48. That FL law does under involve a first amendment issue
Thu Feb 7, 2013, 04:08 AM
Feb 2013

But it has nothing to do with tort immunity.

Yes, that Florida law involves a first amendment question and it involves guns. And it is relevant to a first amendment right to file product liability claims... how?

Going to sleep, you can work the shovel without me.

That's not the first amendment. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #1
Forget it, he's rolling. SayWut Feb 2013 #3
It's not the First Amendment, but a pink gun??? That looks like a toy not just to a child JDPriestly Feb 2013 #4
Actually, you do raise a first amendment issue jberryhill Feb 2013 #15
where fault lies depends on the circumstance BainsBane Feb 2013 #5
No, they don't Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #7
that's absurd BainsBane Feb 2013 #12
Additional evidence BainsBane Feb 2013 #14
A suit by an individual against a gun company... jberryhill Feb 2013 #17
It does not need to be in a federal court to involve constitutionality BainsBane Feb 2013 #21
Now go read Article III jberryhill Feb 2013 #22
ruling constitutionality BainsBane Feb 2013 #25
Oh good lord... jberryhill Feb 2013 #28
and what aoubt the FL law that bans doctors BainsBane Feb 2013 #30
"Real life lawyers" jberryhill Feb 2013 #33
I thought you said one year of law school? BainsBane Feb 2013 #35
I said one year of civ pro and a year and a half of con law jberryhill Feb 2013 #37
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #39
Congrats. jberryhill Feb 2013 #43
well, I would like to discuss the issue of BainsBane Feb 2013 #45
Then start a thread on it jberryhill Feb 2013 #47
That FL law does under involve a first amendment issue jberryhill Feb 2013 #48
And by the way jberryhill Feb 2013 #31
then why do you refuse to address the central question? BainsBane Feb 2013 #34
Holy... jberryhill Feb 2013 #38
You again refuse to address the question BainsBane Feb 2013 #41
The title of this thread is: jberryhill Feb 2013 #40
several posts ago I wrote: BainsBane Feb 2013 #42
And in law school jberryhill Feb 2013 #44
I have not changed the topic BainsBane Feb 2013 #46
no where did I or the image BainsBane Feb 2013 #6
The Supreme Court supports my position BainsBane Feb 2013 #11
The right to sue THE GOVERNMENT jberryhill Feb 2013 #13
it specifies petitions to the courts BainsBane Feb 2013 #16
Sigh... jberryhill Feb 2013 #19
you aren't reading the links BainsBane Feb 2013 #24
I am reading the links jberryhill Feb 2013 #26
Did you read the argument by the First Amendment Center? BainsBane Feb 2013 #27
Yes and you are still entirely off the map jberryhill Feb 2013 #29
the ruling was based on political expression BainsBane Feb 2013 #32
The birther cases are thrown out for lack of standing jberryhill Feb 2013 #36
another source BainsBane Feb 2013 #18
Basic gun safety should be taught in public schools NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #2
Unless it's a toy gun, right? jberryhill Feb 2013 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #8
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #9
Good question. DeSwiss Feb 2013 #10
That second item is a gun, not a toy. But there are lots of toys that geckosfeet Feb 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #48