Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
22. From Senator Wyden's statement
Wed Feb 6, 2013, 09:57 AM
Feb 2013
As I and ten other senators told the President yesterday, if individual Americans choose to take up arms against the United States, there will clearly be some circumstances in which the President has the authority to use lethal force against those Americans, just as President Lincoln had the authority to use force against the Confederate Army during the Civil War. At the same time, it is vitally important for Congress and the American public to have a full understanding of how the executive branch interprets this authority, so that Congress and the public can decide whether the President’s power to deliberately kill American citizens is subject to appropriate limitations and safeguards. Every American has the right to know when their government believes that it is allowed to kill them.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022320280
Beyond that precedent, it appears that the questions are designed to clarify the process and, primarily, to ensure that it's actually targeting people who take up arms against the U.S.

Well, Russ, you can go back to sleep. MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #1
Feingold said that the attack on Anwar Al Awlaki was "not necessarily wrong" OnyxCollie Feb 2013 #7
It's too bad you can't see the larger picture. Bonobo Feb 2013 #2
What moral authority? Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #53
is it less bad if one isn't an american ? JI7 Feb 2013 #3
He apparently doesn't see the killing of the AQ opertive as a constitutional intrusion. Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #4
Who is going to sympathize with a terrorist? MrSlayer Feb 2013 #5
Not me. n/t ProSense Feb 2013 #11
I Agree With Sen. Feingold, Ma'am The Magistrate Feb 2013 #6
+1 Historic NY Feb 2013 #21
Yes. i also agree with the Senator. Bake Feb 2013 #44
The Liberal-Libertarian hybrid has gone haywire again. Is there any wonder.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2013 #8
Libertarians don't care about that stuff, it's all about bashin Obama here. freshwest Feb 2013 #17
Someone might revoke their liberal card if they don't show a proper amount of outrage... EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #19
Exactly. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2013 #25
And tama Feb 2013 #57
So I'm only allowed to be outraged SomethingFishy Feb 2013 #56
Call me when the president breaks the law. Until then,, Tarheel_Dem Feb 2013 #58
Your posts are like a game. What is her point? I know, I know, since Russ Feingold is ok with rhett o rick Feb 2013 #9
Do you ProSense Feb 2013 #10
Oh plezzzzz. Your adoration is clouding your judgement. rhett o rick Feb 2013 #12
My "adoration" of Feingold? ProSense Feb 2013 #13
And your point is??????????? rhett o rick Feb 2013 #14
So you took a point about 2008 to claim: ProSense Feb 2013 #15
Back to your point. Are you saying that because rhett o rick Feb 2013 #28
I am pleased this guy is gone as well. Doesn't mean I am pleased with this new position Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #16
When the evidence is overwhelming... Hulk Feb 2013 #18
Finally, some goddamn common sense on DU... nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #20
Whoomp there it is! Bake Feb 2013 #45
From Senator Wyden's statement ProSense Feb 2013 #22
Same here. Don't want to be killed by the Government? Don't be in a FSogol Feb 2013 #23
I don't give a damn choie Feb 2013 #24
It's a good thing ProSense Feb 2013 #26
And? ljm2002 Feb 2013 #27
Please, ProSense Feb 2013 #29
Oh, I see... ljm2002 Feb 2013 #31
Yes, ProSense Feb 2013 #32
Did I say anything about a rule? ljm2002 Feb 2013 #34
LOL! ProSense Feb 2013 #36
Judging by your post count... ljm2002 Feb 2013 #38
"I do believe"....I do think...." I wonder why he did not say "I KNOW....."? WinkyDink Feb 2013 #30
Yes, trot out the unfortunate opinion of a democrat in hope of stifling dissent whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #33
Damn, it isn't working. ProSense Feb 2013 #35
Yes whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #37
Don't you love it ProSense Feb 2013 #39
Straw Man? Why did you post Feingold's opinion whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #40
Because I wanted to? ProSense Feb 2013 #41
I don't believe your intentions are sinister whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #43
Well, gee ProSense Feb 2013 #46
It only took whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #48
Question: ProSense Feb 2013 #49
Don't flatter yourself whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #51
"I'm not obsessed with you, it's just near impossible to avoid you." ProSense Feb 2013 #52
Hey, ProSense Feb 2013 #42
Funny how you're still talking despite all that stifling. DevonRex Feb 2013 #54
That's because the technique whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #55
doesn't Howard Dean also support the use of Drones JI7 Feb 2013 #47
i agree with feingold most of the time arely staircase Feb 2013 #50
I guess all of the sudden Feingold is a cretin Floyd_Gondolli Feb 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flashback: Russ Feingold ...»Reply #22