General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: White House: Drone Strikes ‘Legal,’ ‘Ethical’ And ‘Wise’ [View all]ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
At Wed Feb 6, 2013, 12:41 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hey White House: FUCK YOU. A little problem with "absolute power" there?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2319969
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Feb 6, 2013, 12:50 AM, and the Jury voted 0-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Another bogus alert by a knee jerk jerk.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I think the White House can take it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: If the alerter can't be bothered to justify their own alert and I personally have no issue with the post, I will voted to leave it. In this case, the poster is passionate in their opinion and they are welcome to it. And I happen to agree in principle.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Perhaps a little over-the-top and hyperbolic but thinking drone strikes are shitty doesn't make you not a progressive.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.