Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Notice to the Democratic party.... [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)104. Sorry, but I'm still trying to figure out how someone not posting under his/her real name
could possibly think so many thousands of other people, who also are not posting under their own names, are what they claim to be and are not just trying to divide people, just like any OP from anyone not posting under his/her own name.
Aren't you just asking for it?
Why would you do that?
Not that you are, necessarily, but that IS a possibility, don't you agree? And if you recognize it as a possibility, why would you do it, since that possibility creates the very thing that you SAY you don't want?
Or do you?
Take a step back from yourself and take a look at how your post looks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LOL. I'm neither for nor totally against at this point, but this is just silly.
TwilightGardener
Feb 2013
#1
You assume gramps would haved chosen sarah baracuda is he were running against Hillary.
sadbear
Feb 2013
#19
if she wants the nomination she willl have to earn it....just like others running nt
msongs
Feb 2013
#4
The replies are reflections of the tone of the post, not of feelings about Hillary
HERVEPA
Feb 2013
#14
I'm a big Hillary fan, but this is ridiculously provocative... Give it a rest, kindly...
hlthe2b
Feb 2013
#10
I hate to say it, but most of politics is playing on one's feelings about a candidate's character.
glowing
Feb 2013
#45
I'm fine with Hillary, BUT, I'll support the most liberal candidate. Hillary a bit hawkish for me.
Zen Democrat
Feb 2013
#27
The media is already trying to hype 2014 because it makes them tons of money
Cynicus Emeritus
Feb 2013
#34
So - If There Is A Better Candidate Than Clinton - You Would Deny The Country A Better President?
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#51
There is no better candidate than Hillary, (except for Biden if she doesn't run)
Auntie Bush
Feb 2013
#61
That Is Your Opinion And Your Opinion Only - Not Everyone Will Agree With That Opinion
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#62
Disagree - The Tone Of The Original Post Was Intransigence - That Typically Sets Poorly With Many
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#64
Do you really think Elizabeth Warren would have voted to authorize a war
coalition_unwilling
Feb 2013
#80
As Stated Up-Thread - The OP Was One Of Intransigence - Hillary Or Else - That Does Not Sit Well
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#72
Criminey. We're only three months after the last presidential election
Seeking Serenity
Feb 2013
#56
How about we wait until(if) she announces before we go bat shit crazy around here?
yourout
Feb 2013
#57
I guess that means you're giving her a pass for her vote to authorize
coalition_unwilling
Feb 2013
#77
I agree with you 100%. There is going to be a fight if some on DU persist in their limited
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#83
Oh good God, DU3 and its jury system is going to be a fucking spectacle to behold come primaries.
JVS
Feb 2013
#94
LOL who's trying to "gain control of the Democratic Party and set it marching to their own agenda"
limpyhobbler
Feb 2013
#103
Sorry, but I'm still trying to figure out how someone not posting under his/her real name
patrice
Feb 2013
#104