General Discussion

bvar22

(39,909 posts)

21. Wait..... What?

Sun Feb 3, 2013, 06:23 PM

Feb 2013

You "really don't care" where he stands or sits or kneels or whatever, or what his opinions are for that matter.....

....but you jump in here twice to attack him personally with vague and unsupported insults?
I mean, WTF?

You KNOW that doesn't make ANY sense,
don't you?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pannetta: entitlements must be on the table [View all] MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Sherman A1 Feb 2013 #1

If I lean toward Krugman, Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Sherman A1 Feb 2013 #14

Yes, it is my opinion that I stand to the left of Krugman. Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Sherman A1 Feb 2013 #16

Wait..... What? bvar22 Feb 2013 #21

This the same guy that was whining about defense cuts? Cali_Democrat Feb 2013 #2

If he ain't a reich-winger, he is surely parrots the reich-wing meme: to wit, indepat Feb 2013 #9

He can eat horse dung for all I care. Massive arthritisR_US Feb 2013 #39

And why do I care what the sec of defense thinks again? still_one Feb 2013 #3

I expect we'll get sequestration cuts, and then a restored military budget via multi-step increases HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #4

How about the $633 BILLION-dollar military funding bill woo me with science Feb 2013 #8

It's not entitlements, it's EARNED BENEFITS. AndyA Feb 2013 #5

Distinction without a difference duffyduff Feb 2013 #11

The difference is some people hear "entitlements" and that equals a hand out AndyA Feb 2013 #12

+10.000 smirkymonkey Feb 2013 #19

It's not entitlements, Blue_In_AK Feb 2013 #20

Let's put his fucking entitlements on the chopping block Autumn Feb 2013 #6

Says the fucking guy who asks for $670 Million per jet fighter to fight no aerial combats. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #10

Exactly. Who on Earth (literally) Is Going to Get into an Air War with the US? dballance Feb 2013 #28

Its all those aerial dogfights with the Taliban. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #41

Which ones, beagle eyes - The military's, or the necessary expenditures? TheCowsCameHome Feb 2013 #13

Is Pannetta Trying to Gain Favor in the MIC to Get His Lucrative Post-Gov't. Job? dballance Feb 2013 #17

We Have A Winner! cantbeserious Feb 2013 #24

Ding Ding Ding! newthinking Feb 2013 #25

Bingo! ReRe Feb 2013 #31

Military spending must be on the table, first! mfcorey1 Feb 2013 #18

With Democrats like this, who needs Republicans? Gregorian Feb 2013 #22

Fuck him MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #23

If so, then military/war spending goddamn well should be on the chopping block. nt HooptieWagon Feb 2013 #26

Why is the former head of the military and CIA discussing entitlement reform? think Feb 2013 #27

Panetta was also Clinton's Chief of Staff and head of OMB kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #37

Thank you think Feb 2013 #42

You mean "entitlements" like Boeing, General Dynamics and the rest of the $trillion BlueStreak Feb 2013 #29

Now Pannetta is an expert in economics too? Curmudgeoness Feb 2013 #30

I heard him on MTP, we have to have entitlement reform doc03 Feb 2013 #32

Let's start by removing entitlements for the generals ...and congress. n/t L0oniX Feb 2013 #33

Rest of country: forget it! nt Deep13 Feb 2013 #34

start with his SHRED Feb 2013 #35

Of course, he must mean all the tax loophole entitlements the rich get. valerief Feb 2013 #36

If we were in dire straights I would agree..... Swede Atlanta Feb 2013 #38

Says another rich asshole who will never need them anyway. ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2013 #40

I agree. Kablooie Feb 2013 #43