Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Armed 'Good Guys' And The Realities Of Facing A Gunman [View all]Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)11. How is it "apparent" he would have left at that point?
I'm not sure where you're pulling that from.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your language choices, re "Talibanners", are those used by Republicans and Freepers.
TeamPooka
Jan 2013
#44
Someone uses a stupid term like "gun humpers," I will use an equally
Common Sense Party
Jan 2013
#48
there's like maybe 3 examples of you can use but thousands of shootings and deaths etc
TeamPooka
Jan 2013
#43
Now, now...there's no call for bringing logic and common sense into an emotional debate. n/t
Common Sense Party
Jan 2013
#32
Sure thing. Make sure you point out one of these "adults" if you see one in this thread.
Common Sense Party
Jan 2013
#49
You do realize that in the link you provide, the "good guy" didn't fire a single shot?
Whovian
Jan 2013
#20
I feel for the guy, but apparently gunner would have left at that point. Instead, our would be hero
Hoyt
Jan 2013
#6
New I'd encountered you before. My can of beans works well -- has kept criminals at bay without
Hoyt
Jan 2013
#40
Of course, most police officers don't have any idea what a "live situation" is like, either.
Common Sense Party
Jan 2013
#24