General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women try to get recourse for revenge porn photo posts [View all]seabeyond
(110,159 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
At Fri Jan 25, 2013, 11:35 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
Why would they say no? Prudishness? Lack of compensation? Shyness?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2259263
only one thing about the poster.
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Poster is defending men's right to put a naked picture of a woman on the net against her will. This is misogyny.
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Jan 25, 2013, 11:43 AM, and voted 4-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'd bet this won't be hidden, but I'd vote to hide anything by this jerk. He should have been banned from DU long ago.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: in what world does the poster think it's ok to put a naked picture of ANYONE anywhere against their will or without their consent. WTF?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: *sigh* Poster is expressing a different point of view than yours afaic. Why not engage in conversation rather than hiding the post?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Poster is asking a question here. It is not against the rules on DU to ask a question.