Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
14. The complete quote is ...
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jan 2013
In 2002, she worried about the government arresting too many top executives – “Arresting executives is a way that the government tries to prove it means what it says in terms of cracking down,” White told The New York Times in 2002. “The danger, of course — and it’s a significant one — is overkill, sweeping into the prosecutorial frenzy people who should not be charged.”


Are you suggesting that she does not believe those that should not be charged, just to make a point, would be an appropriate or just approach?

So no ... that doesn't seal anything.
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #1
That's equivalent to rounding up pscot Jan 2013 #6
In case you missed this, babylonsister Jan 2013 #2
very popular thread Enrique Jan 2013 #4
I saw that . . . trouble though getting past this: bigtree Jan 2013 #5
But you gotta love a beer guzzling motorcycle mama... babylonsister Jan 2013 #7
lol bigtree Jan 2013 #11
this is the first I've heard about this Enrique Jan 2013 #3
In my view ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #9
for me it's a question of incentives and interests Enrique Jan 2013 #12
This ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #13
Oh what difference does it make? There'll be no prosecution of banksters, and everyone knows it. nt Romulox Jan 2013 #8
this pretty much seals it, I think bigtree Jan 2013 #10
The complete quote is ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I may be wrong in the end...»Reply #14