Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
9. Or, they could get busy finding the ubber progressive candidate they want in 2016.
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:40 AM
Jan 2013

All of this "no body loves us" stuff gets a bit stale after awhile.

If you, or other democrats, don't like this President, then you better get busy locating the person/people you really want, at both the National, state, and local level.

I find that here on DU I see 10 or 100 "Obama isn't liberal enough OPs" as compared to OPs dedicated to finding sufficiently progressive or liberal candidates.

So if you have any of these sufficiently progressive candidates in mind, you might want to start promoting them.

vote, then shut up and let the serious people get on with the bipartisanship. KG Jan 2013 #1
+1 xchrom Jan 2013 #4
Another +1 hobbit709 Jan 2013 #6
LOL, that was my thought exactly! Myrina Jan 2013 #22
And to provide comic relief for the elites peace frog Jan 2013 #24
+1 plus let those serious people make fun of you. n/t KarenS Jan 2013 #29
+1 leftstreet Jan 2013 #32
Don't forget the "Send Money!" Plucketeer Jan 2013 #33
CENTRISM !!!!! bvar22 Jan 2013 #47
Did you forget something? Atman Jan 2013 #2
No. kentuck Jan 2013 #3
Jerry Brown works WITH President Obama and IS a democratic person. graham4anything Jan 2013 #5
Right! kentuck Jan 2013 #8
Doormats. Warm bodies. Useful idiots. MrSlayer Jan 2013 #7
Or, they could get busy finding the ubber progressive candidate they want in 2016. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #9
What the hell is a "ubber" progressive?? kentuck Jan 2013 #11
Apprently, from what I read here, he was not "sufficiently" progresive. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #14
are you sure that's allowed? Enrique Jan 2013 #17
Wasn't Hillary a "sure thing" in 2008? JoePhilly Jan 2013 #19
That's funny, I sure hear a lot of crap about 2010 being lost due to the left staying home Fumesucker Jan 2013 #10
sigh. yet another post that brings the collective IQ of DU down, down, down. cali Jan 2013 #12
To be honest... kentuck Jan 2013 #13
+10 Myrina Jan 2013 #23
well, it's so nice you help that trend on a consistent basis. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #28
I have to agree, and it isn't the liberals that are bringing it down. n/t A Simple Game Jan 2013 #50
UHHHHHHHHHHHMERICA!!!!!!!11111111111 datasuspect Jan 2013 #52
That could be your sig! nt Romulox Jan 2013 #26
Democrats are in a new Don`t-Make-Waves era democrank Jan 2013 #15
Thanks..... fadedrose Jan 2013 #49
+1 Blue_Tires Jan 2013 #55
Dry, tangy with just a hint of sarcasm. A lot of people actually think this way. leveymg Jan 2013 #16
Apparently their role is to clutter up the internet... Scootaloo Jan 2013 #18
I'll put on my Obama-bot hat and say quinnox Jan 2013 #20
Don't shut up ... simply start to promote a sufficiently progressive canddiate for 2016 JoePhilly Jan 2013 #31
Wasn't that tried with Dennis Kucinich? geomon666 Jan 2013 #36
Then give up I guess. JoePhilly Jan 2013 #42
Same as conservatives and 'regressives' in the republican party? pampango Jan 2013 #21
Unfortunately, the corporate interests you promote here are not "progressive" in any way. Romulox Jan 2013 #27
You got me! Such a fact-filled, detailed counter-argument reveals my true nature. pampango Jan 2013 #37
There is no point in "debating" talking points from CATO. You run away whenever pressed, anyhow. nt Romulox Jan 2013 #38
I did not know that CATO was promoting progressive taxes, corporate regulation and a strong safety pampango Jan 2013 #39
It's the US Chamber of Commerce economics to which I refer, and you know it. Romulox Jan 2013 #40
Well, of course. The Chamber is well known for promoting progressive taxes, corporate regulation, pampango Jan 2013 #44
You're being coy, and you know it. That's fine with me, actually. Romulox Jan 2013 #48
Good. Then we are both happy. n/t pampango Jan 2013 #53
"We know how to win elections without you" reteachinwi Jan 2013 #25
We are a "big tent" party 33Greeper Jan 2013 #30
They make a center right party appear to have standards n/t leftstreet Jan 2013 #34
Did you get up on the wrong side of the bed or something? ReRe Jan 2013 #35
They are deliberate, misleading scenery, woo me with science Jan 2013 #41
A rebuttal. Chan790 Jan 2013 #43
They should get the fuck off their crosses and show the fuck up at a meeting or two. msanthrope Jan 2013 #45
Vote for what they believe in and vote against what they don't. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2013 #46
according to shit ass rahm datasuspect Jan 2013 #51
We know how to win elections without you. stonecutter357 Jan 2013 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is the role of liber...»Reply #9