Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
7. It's also an example of failing to think just one more step...
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:49 AM
Jan 2013

...ahead. What happens when failmode activates?

And really, just how did such a boneheaded failure-mode blunder get made at all, let alone in fuel valves on a plane.

It is in all likelihood a good plane. It's also probably highly representative of the limits of refinement of a basic theme that's seen little radical development in decades.

Reshaping wings to look like the fins of a humpback whale could potentially shave fuel consumption by 10% alone.

Flying wings, lifting bodies and partial bouyancy are other ideas that offer multiple percentage point improvements in efficiency.

And we can't get the bloody things out of the wind tunnel because they don't fit anyone's preconceived ideas of what planes should look like. Same fate befell the silent vacuum cleaner. By the time it was technically feasible, people damned well knew what a vacuum cleaner sounded like, and that Charlie was clearly not doing its job.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boeing's 787 Dreamliner a...»Reply #7