General Discussion

emulatorloo

(44,045 posts)

6. Your oh so predictable bullshit

Reply to MannyGoldstein (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 21, 2013, 11:24 PM

Jan 2013

Desperate grasping at straws is fun to watch. Especially from Fox News commentators and DU's "Manny Goldstein"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Anyone know the total cash paid in by corporate sponsors of the inaugural soirees? [View all] MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 OP

You cant put a price on DJ13 Jan 2013 #1

you can probably put a value on the rewards of the bought influence tho nt msongs Jan 2013 #4

I'll ask one of the Bushes. WinkyDink Jan 2013 #11

... SidDithers Jan 2013 #2

Dare I ask. I dare. MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #3

Your oh so predictable bullshit emulatorloo Jan 2013 #6

So the following is false: MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #13

I am not your research assistant emulatorloo Jan 2013 #18

ExxonMobil will give $250K to inauguration MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #20

Do not give this one the satisfaction of a conversation alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #17

Understood. emulatorloo Jan 2013 #21

You know what? Summer Hathaway Jan 2013 #23

I double unshun him! Luminous Animal Jan 2013 #28

+1 alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #5

You better believe it emulatorloo Jan 2013 #10

Please to enjoy: Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #7

Re the Open Secrets links : "the contributions listed are from employees of that company" emulatorloo Jan 2013 #16

Thank you nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #34

The right is probably whining that the taxpayers paid for it treestar Jan 2013 #8

If so their product placement SUCKS. nolabear Jan 2013 #9

THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE, EVER! WinkyDink Jan 2013 #12

Didn't happen in 2009. nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #14

Well, if you know so much, then you know how to answer your own query, n'cest-pas? WinkyDink Jan 2013 #19

Billions and billions jberryhill Jan 2013 #15

I know lobbyists groups were banned from donating, but corp's & unions were allowed unlimited. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #22

Hmmm... few even want to consider the question or the implication. Luminous Animal Jan 2013 #24

Far more fun to fume at the messenger. MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #25

Certainly less taxing intellectual-wise... Luminous Animal Jan 2013 #26

LOL n/t Oilwellian Jan 2013 #31

Far more fun to watch you pretend you are credible emulatorloo Jan 2013 #27

Well, it's true that one of us is making claims that are flatly refuted by the media MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #29

Zzzzz emulatorloo Jan 2013 #33

Better Believe It! MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #37

Ha ha emulatorloo Jan 2013 #39

This round's on Karl Rove MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #47

Messenger? You consider yourself a "messenger"? You don't post any information in the OP. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #45

Google the word "implicit" nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #46

So you have absolutely nothing to offer. Yet again. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #49

Can't we be allowed to have Just. One. Day. Hekate Jan 2013 #30

Here is an interesting link from Truthout Autumn Jan 2013 #32

Interesting ProSense Jan 2013 #35

Thank you. nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #36

Unions must know why reteachinwi Jan 2013 #38

I think Unions always contribute to Democratic causes. Autumn Jan 2013 #42

What do you think ProSense Jan 2013 #40

Manny - Firedoglake called, they want their meme back. stevenleser Jan 2013 #41

Ouch. MannyGoldstein Jan 2013 #44

If you really gave a shit why not do the research yourself? Are we your minions? KittyWampus Jan 2013 #43

Oddly, my local RW rag brought up the same question. Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #48