Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama needs to be impeached. [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)37. Sexism in a post defending religion?
Quelle surprise!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An awful lot of DUers claim outrage that the inauguration today was just one big ol' church service
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#11
If the atheists are allowed to go on and on and on and on about this as they do every single day,
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#15
I know lots of religious nuts. Who are some militant atheist nuts? I need to learn. n-t
Logical
Jan 2013
#59
Really? Because I saw plenty of atheists/nonbelievers today joining in the "shooting down"
NYC Liberal
Jan 2013
#54
I didn't start any of the previous ones. But I am entitled to my opinion on the matter.
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#9
I am about as religious as my cats AND I am more likely than most to complain about the insertion of
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#13
No, some of us just get tired of hearing it, the religious ceremony in public life become wearisome
Fumesucker
Jan 2013
#22
That "have a blessed day" thing annoys me, but I guess I believe in freedom of expression and
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#27
Yep. You caught me. I'm tolerant of others whose beliefs are different from mine.
onenote
Jan 2013
#45
Because another Rove memo went out and it became the poutrage topic du jour.
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#10
I am fairly certain that Clarence Thomas was not involved in any such conversation with our
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#28
Those words are not part of the oath, the person taking the oath decides if they want to add them or
RB TexLa
Jan 2013
#42
Yes, I meant Roberts. I had a "DUH" moment there. But I was referring only to the pronouns!
WinkyDink
Jan 2013
#57
I am in complete agreement with you other than your opposition to our president or any individual
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#32
I for one would LOVE to see a nonbeliever elected to high office. That would be as great a day as
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#65
I've always said that we are none of us truly free until the atheists AND SATANISTS are free.
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#66
People who would like the establishment clause respected are religion haters.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2013
#35
Be aware that when you create titles like that, RW media may use your post to say that
stevenleser
Jan 2013
#56
Is there some point you are trying to make or just trying to cause a fight? n-t
Logical
Jan 2013
#58