Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 1776 vs 2013 [View all]One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)23. And Tet 1 was a military disaster for Giap
So what is the point. Yes we can kill at will. And what good did it do in South Vietnam?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
All out war has changed and it depends on what the military and CiC are willing to do
SWTORFanatic
Jan 2013
#32
And if we leave but the Afghan military is able to keep them out of power, did they still win?
SWTORFanatic
Jan 2013
#33
You also have to remember that the British were also entangled with fighting the French as well
Victor_c3
Jan 2013
#12
I like the way the right wing nuts won't cut military spending, but also feel the need to arm
JoePhilly
Jan 2013
#30
In the current environment, what reason would make their revolt the "right" thing to do?
JoePhilly
Jan 2013
#40
This is why I think the "we need guns to protect against tyranny" argument is a bad one
Hugabear
Jan 2013
#45
To start the Syrian rebels did not have that type of firepower. I think this is where the...
NCTraveler
Jan 2013
#47
So what... the second amendment is irrelevant because technology has advanced?
OneTenthofOnePercent
Jan 2013
#48