Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
1. What about safe storage and owner accountability for their firearms?
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jan 2013

I think that would have a lot better chance of passing Congress than any of the items mentioned in the OP, and be more effective at hindering gun crime to boot.

What about safe storage and owner accountability for their firearms? LAGC Jan 2013 #1
The Heller decision explicitly overturned that eallen Jan 2013 #48
My response: Bay Boy Jan 2013 #2
My response to your response Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #3
The issue with a gun database hack89 Jan 2013 #5
You know something? Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #7
Do you deny that there are people and groups that oppose civilian ownership of guns? hack89 Jan 2013 #9
They are as delusional as you are... Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #23
In turn, can you understand... Orrex Jan 2013 #8
So if private citizens should not be allowed to own certain semi-automatic rifles hack89 Jan 2013 #11
You'd need to convince me that such a database would do more harm than good Orrex Jan 2013 #17
Just phrase the laws in such a way to keep actual possession legal hack89 Jan 2013 #22
Making progress, but let me clarify... Orrex Jan 2013 #24
It is time to properly define what cosmetic features semi-automatic rifles can have. hack89 Jan 2013 #25
I'm ok with that, but what about my question? Orrex Jan 2013 #28
There would be more trust if we had strong definitions hack89 Jan 2013 #31
In fairness, that citation is 25 years old Orrex Jan 2013 #32
And yet what happens here when the conversation turns technical? hack89 Jan 2013 #33
Well... Orrex Jan 2013 #36
Any definition is probably going to have to be filtered down a bit. Buns_of_Fire Jan 2013 #27
I've had similar thoughts, in fact Orrex Jan 2013 #30
do you honestly believe that if gun seizures are imminent.. frylock Jan 2013 #40
They would never attempt a house to house confiscation hack89 Jan 2013 #41
they won't be able to confiscate guns, which make concerns of using a database.. frylock Jan 2013 #42
Why won't they be able to? hack89 Jan 2013 #44
well there you have it. my mistake.. frylock Jan 2013 #45
That's fine hack89 Jan 2013 #46
on further review, it doesn't appear that there was a visitation by LEOs.. frylock Jan 2013 #47
No - California did not buy back those SKS hack89 Jan 2013 #49
BUYBACK PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN SKS SPORTER RIFLES TO END FRIDAY. frylock Jan 2013 #50
My bad - you are right. nt hack89 Jan 2013 #51
no prob. it's hard keeping up on this stuff. frylock Jan 2013 #52
an ironclad guarantee guardian Jan 2013 #29
Logic flaw: Slippery Slope Taverner Jan 2013 #55
No. But there is not a lot of trust between the two sides at the movement hack89 Jan 2013 #57
I think in the interest of the country, the gun side should be at least willing to negotiate Taverner Jan 2013 #60
So what do you wish to see banned? nt hack89 Jan 2013 #61
I don't know Taverner Jan 2013 #62
Sure you will. Heimer Jan 2013 #15
What if you don't know they're stolen? Orrex Jan 2013 #19
Why do I have to tell the government what guns I own... Bay Boy Jan 2013 #34
Why do I have to show a picture ID to vote? Tsiyu Jan 2013 #37
Should you need an ID to vote? Should you need a permit to protest? hack89 Jan 2013 #58
Yes, let's have anarchy Tsiyu Jan 2013 #63
There are limits on guns hack89 Jan 2013 #64
I'd support 1 maybe 2 of those listed. ileus Jan 2013 #4
I support, and expect passage, of all 5. Robb Jan 2013 #6
I would not support number 4. I am good with the rest. nt Mojorabbit Jan 2013 #10
"That Gun Owners Support?" That makes me laugh... derby378 Jan 2013 #12
Perhaps you are more fringe than you realize? Robb Jan 2013 #16
Dude, I'm the new normal - and one day, you'll realize it's not that bad derby378 Jan 2013 #18
Among DU gun enthusiasts, probably. Robb Jan 2013 #20
Try That Line On The Parents Of Those Dead School Kids, Mr. "New Normal" (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #43
I support 2 of 5 Heimer Jan 2013 #13
Civilian armories derby378 Jan 2013 #21
Mixed bag. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #14
"Needs a sixth: mandatory firearms security for all gun owners." Bay Boy Jan 2013 #35
I wish I knew! Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #38
Because SCOTUS says you can't. jeff47 Jan 2013 #53
How are you going to keep track of six if four can fuck right off? Orrex Jan 2013 #39
kick samsingh Jan 2013 #26
I think an overwhelming majority would agree with 1, 3, and 5. nt. NCTraveler Jan 2013 #54
My 5 are better Glassunion Jan 2013 #56
"Most gun owners support" justanidea Jan 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Five Gun Safety Laws ...»Reply #1