General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'I'm convinced a second gunman was involved in killing my uncle': Robert Kennedy [View all]Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Limbaugh's currently getting some mileage out of tactics similar to yours with his climate change denial efforts.
The 18 zillion instances of 'direct concrete evidence', that there are holes and flaws in the official story, are readily available to see, for anyone who is 'skeptical' enough to read and look. Can't think of any of them to cite that will reach the unbelievably high bar you set for evidence that you will accept. Because proof refuting the official story has been shown and given before, not just after 50 years, but since the day of the assassination. You either know nothing about it, or have seen it all and it's not good enough.
Like Limbaugh on climate change, scream 'shut up' at other people, while demanding they 'prove it', and ignore proof in favor of a 'dog ate my homework' style statement like 'it's cold in San Diego' (while ignoring 60 + degree temps in the northeast and midwest), as a way of shilling for the official oil industry party line. It would be as easy to convince that blockhead as it would be to convince you.
Sorry I ignored all your orders, couched in the term 'requests', and didn't even STFU for you.
Who's 'us'? Do you have a mouse in your pocket, is that the editorial 'we', the royal 'we', are you speaking for an organization, or are we talking multiple personalities, here?
The info in the o.p. just takes one more underpinning out from under the foundation the 'official story' backers rely upon, their fall back line that 'if there was a conspiracy, why don't the Kennedy's say anything?'