Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
16. So you really think that Livestrong has done more to help cancer victims than ACS?
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jan 2013

Even if Livestrong actually was the do-gooding charity you think it is, this would be preposterous, given that ACS is something like 20 times bigger. But you might want to read up on Livestrong. A lot of what they do is marketing and "awareness" -- i.e. building up the Lance Armstrong brand.

But the foundation’s financial reports from 2009 and 2010 show that Livestrong’s resources pay for a very large amount of marketing and PR. During those years, the foundation raised $84 million and spent just over $60 million. (The rest went into a reserve of cash and assets that now tops $100 million.)

A surprising $4.2 million of that went straight to advertising, including large expenditures for banner ads and optimal search-engine placement. Outsourcing is the order of the day: $14 million of total spending, or more than 20 percent, went to outside consultants and professionals. That figure includes $2 million for construction, but much of the money went to independent organizations that actually run Livestrong programs. For example, Livestrong paid $1 million to a Boston–based public-health consulting firm to manage its campaigns in Mexico and South Africa against cancer stigma—the perception that cancer is contagious or invariably fatal.

Livestrong touts its stigma programs, but it spent more than triple that, $3.5 million in 2010 alone, for merchandise giveaways and order fulfillment. Curiously, on Livestrong’s tax return most of those merchandise costs were categorized as “program” expenses. CFO Greg Lee says donating the wristbands counts as a program because “it raises awareness.”

This kind of spending dwarfs Livestrong’s outlays for its direct services and patient-focused programs like Livestrong at the YMCA, an exercise routine tailored to cancer survivors available at YMCAs nationwide ($424,000 in 2010). There’s also a Livestrong at School program, offered in conjunction with Scholastic magazine ($630,000 in 2010). “Explain to students that Lance was very sick with cancer but that he was treated and got better,” begins one sample lesson plan for grades three through six.
...


http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/athletes/lance-armstrong/Its-Not-About-the-Lab-Rats.html
Lance Armstrong and Consequences [View all] Are_grits_groceries Jan 2013 OP
My father (an active competitive cyclist) and I were talking recently... Earth_First Jan 2013 #1
Armstrong has played a large part Are_grits_groceries Jan 2013 #2
as a bit of a cyclist (over 25,000 miles) hfojvt Jan 2013 #15
I don't think there were winners by default Ron Obvious Jan 2013 #27
If he threatened and intimidated and Skidmore Jan 2013 #3
Probably. Are_grits_groceries Jan 2013 #7
Lance is innocent...hopefully he'll admit nothing. ileus Jan 2013 #4
You forgot this... trumad Jan 2013 #5
you do know he is supposed to ADMIT his guilt in this interview? spanone Jan 2013 #20
What kills me is why his lawyers allowed him to do the interview duffyduff Jan 2013 #22
How about forcing him to return ALL the money won while on PEDs? wake.up.america Jan 2013 #6
I support Lance sellitman Jan 2013 #8
Is this a joke? DanTex Jan 2013 #9
Research is different than Support. sellitman Jan 2013 #14
So you really think that Livestrong has done more to help cancer victims than ACS? DanTex Jan 2013 #16
As I said, Are_grits_groceries Jan 2013 #10
Look no further than how Greg and Kathy LeMond were treated duffyduff Jan 2013 #21
he cheated. he shames his sport. and you support that? whatever. spanone Jan 2013 #11
He could have been a great hero without the lies. undeterred Jan 2013 #13
Oh, my. Words fail me. n/t duffyduff Jan 2013 #19
denial is interesting, no? It is possible to roguevalley Jan 2013 #23
To me, at least, cheating is cheating. It doen't matter , if he won or not. wake.up.america Jan 2013 #28
Just go away, Lance SoCalDem Jan 2013 #12
Armstrong is a liar and a cheat. Whisp Jan 2013 #17
He needs to be a pariah. Shame on Oprah for giving him a forum. n/t duffyduff Jan 2013 #18
WO will laugh all the way to the bank. wake.up.america Jan 2013 #26
This thread is proof that we have a athlete-worship problem in this country. Odin2005 Jan 2013 #24
How do you figure that? Prometheus Bound Jan 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lance Armstrong and Conse...»Reply #16