Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,880 posts)
49. Oh, thanks for that info! It is good to know!
Fri Jan 11, 2013, 09:24 PM
Jan 2013

but it IS interesting to see how one artist or one artiistic school influences another art movement...perhaps this is one of those cases...

#2 is by that Dutch guy jberryhill Jan 2013 #1
lol Liberal_in_LA Jan 2013 #2
It isn't the Dutch guy... CTyankee Jan 2013 #4
Okay, maybe that Belgian or Flemish guy jberryhill Jan 2013 #6
strike out! CTyankee Jan 2013 #9
#5 is *TA-DA!* that Dutch guy pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #59
Thank goodness jberryhill Jan 2013 #60
No, I knew all along that you hadn't... CTyankee Jan 2013 #63
#5 looks like a Caravaggio. . . annabanana Jan 2013 #3
it does, but no... CTyankee Jan 2013 #5
#2: Georges de la Tour - The New Born Child nt pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #7
pretty much screams de la Tour, doesn't it? CTyankee Jan 2013 #8
I like Caravaggio better pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #11
number 1 is a degas IcyPeas Jan 2013 #10
Very good! It IS an early Degas...altho I just don't know how you got it from the woman in blue CTyankee Jan 2013 #14
I couldn't guess it, but on review, the fall of the fabric in the veil is a giveaway. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #26
#3 is a Thomas Kinkade. Nye Bevan Jan 2013 #12
It isn't Kinkade altho maybe Kinkade liked this artist. I don't really know since I don't know that CTyankee Jan 2013 #15
#4 could be one of a few American western artists cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #13
Interesting response and of course, you have a background in this art. not johnson, tho...but... CTyankee Jan 2013 #17
Okay... I'll revert to my first guess cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #20
Great analysis! I thought it looked a lot like what we now call photorealism. Or maybe he was CTyankee Jan 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #16
#4: Remington - Moonlight Wolf nt pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #18
there ya go, pinboy! What gave it away to you? CTyankee Jan 2013 #19
He was one possibility, but I wasn't at all sure pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #22
it's very interesting that the artist had this fascination with night painting... CTyankee Jan 2013 #30
I really like that one; it is unique. CrazyOrangeCat Jan 2013 #54
#6: Francisco de Zurbarán - St. Francis nt pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #23
indeed. do you like zubaran? CTyankee Jan 2013 #28
His depictions of monks are interesting pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #34
Nada ellisonz Jan 2013 #24
Oh, I'm sorry. I don't want anybody to feel down about the Challenge. Don't worry, next week CTyankee Jan 2013 #31
I hope so! ellisonz Jan 2013 #35
That's ok, I'll give you some mini-courses with my Challenges! Hopefully, you'll love it so much CTyankee Jan 2013 #37
You forgot the greatest work ever of the illuminated genre Botany Jan 2013 #25
Thank u for giving me a greater appreciation of art. psychmommy Jan 2013 #27
thanks! Did you take art appreciation in school? I find lots of people here telling me that CTyankee Jan 2013 #29
nope, plus I partied alot and vaguely remember my undergrad years. . lol psychmommy Jan 2013 #33
welll, here we are! I came to this kind of art fascination pretty late, too. CTyankee Jan 2013 #36
#s 3 and 5 are left! Let's hear it from you, folks... CTyankee Jan 2013 #32
#3 reminds me of Thomas Hardy's novels. Is it a 19th century painting? yardwork Jan 2013 #38
It is 19th century but I am not connecting to Hardy...but I never read hardy so I don't know... CTyankee Jan 2013 #39
The opening scene of The Return of the Native describes a peasant bonfire celebration. yardwork Jan 2013 #43
Oh, thanks for that info! It is good to know! CTyankee Jan 2013 #49
Millet's painting was done in 1874. The Return of the Native was published in 1878. yardwork Jan 2013 #53
#3: Jean-François Millet - Hunting Birds at Night pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #40
good for you! Interesting work, isn't it? CTyankee Jan 2013 #42
It's very unusual pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #50
a lovely description of this very strange work. It almost seems desperate. What drove people to CTyankee Jan 2013 #51
#5 looks like Artemesia Gentileschi democrat in Tallahassee Jan 2013 #41
it does look like Gentileschi but it is not hers...and I don't think of Leyster into chiaracuro CTyankee Jan 2013 #44
I do like Leyster though democrat in Tallahassee Jan 2013 #46
Oh, I adore both of them. Brave women all. And they did good! (my mouse pad is a Leyster CTyankee Jan 2013 #48
Where's the gd Kincaid? mwdem Jan 2013 #45
well, in a word, no. CTyankee Jan 2013 #47
You do know I'm kidding, right? mwdem Jan 2013 #52
well, no, I don't know how serious anyone coming here is. So I don't want to say anything that is CTyankee Jan 2013 #55
Sorry...I was being flippant mwdem Jan 2013 #56
#5: Hendrick ter Brugghen - The Concert pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #57
Utrecht Caravaggisti, a fascinating group... CTyankee Jan 2013 #62
This was a good choice - it was hard to figure out! yardwork Jan 2013 #69
glad you liked it! Another one next week... CTyankee Jan 2013 #70
oooh, pick me... lapislzi Jan 2013 #58
glad to see you! looks like de la Tour has his followers here at DU tonight... CTyankee Jan 2013 #64
#1 is entitled Mlle Fiocre in the Ballet The Source CTyankee Jan 2013 #66
Thank you! I'm ashamed...I should have known that. lapislzi Jan 2013 #67
Hey, I would never have guessed Degas just by looking at this painting. Without some CTyankee Jan 2013 #68
#6 = St. Francis, by Zurbaran. WinkyDink Jan 2013 #61
The title I have is "St Francis in Ecstasy" altho I think he looks dead... CTyankee Jan 2013 #65
I should have guessed St Francis, having seen one before. Morbidity and decay were certainly on the entanglement Jan 2013 #71
thank you for the kind words! That one is kinda scary... CTyankee Jan 2013 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greetings, DUers! Ready f...»Reply #49