Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Maybe that could ask Obama ... GeorgeGist Jan 2013 #1
I'm betting he's delegated most of the detail work to the inaugural committee. MADem Jan 2013 #6
In time? If they caught it 'in time' it never would have been a news story. Jenoch Jan 2013 #30
In the future, everything that public figures say will be instantly accessible via the internet. MADem Jan 2013 #32
The preacher should have been thoroughly Jenoch Jan 2013 #33
He wasn't, though, unfortunately. That much is clear. MADem Jan 2013 #36
I highly doubt he was personally invited. SpartanDem Jan 2013 #11
Yeah, cuz he's not busy or anything. WilliamPitt Jan 2013 #14
"We were not aware of the concept of 'vetting' until ..." Scuba Jan 2013 #2
Well, they made "the leap." I honestly wouldn't figure that someone who was on the forefront of MADem Jan 2013 #4
I applaud them for correcting their error, but they shouldn't be immune from criticism .... Scuba Jan 2013 #7
Like I said, I would have made the assumption too. How many people do you know who give a shit MADem Jan 2013 #10
If you can't properly vet people who are going to represent the views of the POTUS sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #15
... MADem Jan 2013 #17
Really? Well, if that's what you think. You said it, not I. sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #18
It expresses my opinion of your POV quite clearly. MADem Jan 2013 #21
I am pretty clear always about what I have to say. It appears to me, based on what you sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #43
Well, keep on moving if that makes you happy. MADem Jan 2013 #45
Don't worry, I am very excited about joining the millions of Progressives sabrina 1 Jan 2013 #46
Well you go on with your bad self then--let us know what kind of a difference you make. nt MADem Jan 2013 #50
You are wasting your time. Blind adoration trumps all. I am surprised she ventured out of the rhett o rick Jan 2013 #53
I think I was the first to post on DU that Medgar Evers' widow was speaking at the inauguration Fumesucker Jan 2013 #47
it was an error qazplm Jan 2013 #26
It should be no newsflash that a Christian minister believes that homosexuality is a sin. phleshdef Jan 2013 #13
Really? I'll alert the gentleman at the National Cathedral, then--he'll want to adjust his POV. nt MADem Jan 2013 #16
I'm sorry, but is there some part of the word "most" thats difficult for you to understand? phleshdef Jan 2013 #19
I'll invite your attention to your broad-brushed subject line. MADem Jan 2013 #20
Are you dense or just pretending? phleshdef Jan 2013 #22
Your subject line does not match your message body, and YOU know that. MADem Jan 2013 #23
Yes it does. Work on your reading comprehension. phleshdef Jan 2013 #24
OK, here's an example that is similar to your little post. MADem Jan 2013 #25
Wow, that might the stupidest, most painfully desperate false equivalency ever. phleshdef Jan 2013 #27
You really do have a good grip on that shovel, don't you? MADem Jan 2013 #29
I never tried to walk back anything. Thats a complete and utter lie and you know it. phleshdef Jan 2013 #31
If your subject line was 100% accurate, and you stand by it, then we have nothing to discuss. MADem Jan 2013 #34
You continue to be completely full of shit. phleshdef Jan 2013 #35
And you continue to be rude and personally insulting! MADem Jan 2013 #37
You have been rude by personally insulting the intelligence of anyone reading this exchange. phleshdef Jan 2013 #38
You just can't help yourself, can you? By your words we shall know you! nt MADem Jan 2013 #39
Want some irony? Here's some irony- the Bible condones and codifies human trafficking. Bluenorthwest Jan 2013 #41
Well, plainly, this guy doesn't have any trouble being contradictory. MADem Jan 2013 #42
This is a great improvement over the 2008-09 debacle. yardwork Jan 2013 #3
they screwed up. DCBob Jan 2013 #5
It's been done... DonViejo Jan 2013 #9
At least they can admit and fix a mistake. (this time) Waiting For Everyman Jan 2013 #8
kick bigtree Jan 2013 #12
If you're "not aware," then what are you doing on the damned inaugural committee. Just askin'. ancianita Jan 2013 #28
LMAO!!! Suuuure! Behind the Aegis Jan 2013 #40
He was invited because of his work in combating human trafficking and then his Cha Jan 2013 #44
I completely agree. And the incompetence should be forgiven because they are Democrats. nm rhett o rick Jan 2013 #52
Note to Inaugural Committee stultusporcos Jan 2013 #48
Really? So then what exactly did he and Obama "disagree" about? forestpath Jan 2013 #49
Come on, guys. Ever heard of "The Google?" catbyte Jan 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Inaugural committee: 'We ...»Reply #19