Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
96. Purchased of cars were concentrated in the Rural and Suburban areas prior to WWII
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:33 PM
Jan 2013

And during WWII, the actual number of motor vehicles DECLINED, as many former users of horses return to horses for the duration (The most noted were Milkmen).

AS to your picture of New York City in 1930 see the following quote of New York City TODAY:

New York is the only city in the United States where over half of all households do not own a car (Manhattan's non-ownership is even higher - around 75%; nationally, the rate is 8%).


Around 48% of New Yorkers own cars, yet fewer than 30% use them to commute to work, most finding public transportation cheaper and more convenient for that purpose,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_in_New_York_City#cite_note-2001summary-6

Walk and bicycle modes of travel account for 21% of all modes for trips in the city; nationally the rate for metro regions is about 8%

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transportation_in_New_York_City#cite_note-2001summary-6
http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/pub/STT.pdf
http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acs-15.pdf

In 1930 the Car ownership rate in New York City was even lower. Today, 2013, over 54% of the people of New York use Public Transit to get to work, an additional 21% walk or ride a bike to work, for a total of 75%. The remaining 25% include not only people who drive, but people who fly, take a boat, or take a train to NYC to work.

In the 1920s GM did a study and found that the largest prospective area for growth in Auto usage was Rural America. Grain prices were up due to the fact the US Grain producers #1 competitor, Russia and the Ukraine, were out of the market due to turning Communist (More due to a refusal of other European countries to trade with them then anything else, this was reversed in 1927 when Stalin decided to dump grain onto the world market to pay for his first Five Year plan, but in most of the 20s Rural America was booming).

THe second largest group were Upper Middle Class Urban dwellers, who were also the first to move to the Suburbs, thus while most Working Class stiffs still walked to work from 1920 to 1946, managers and other professionals started to move out to the Suburbs AND use their automobiles to commute to work. Thus your picture proves nothing.

Most people in Urban Area were working class, not the poor, and not the 10% of the population generally considered "Upper Middle Class" (as that term is used today, the term "Middle Class" was used for them till the 1960s when it was decided that unions had moved the Working Class to Middle Class standards and with that change the term Middle Class started to include what use to be called Working Class). It was this group that started to buy cars as early as 1905, and continue to be the main source of car owners till after WWII in urban areas. Most urban areas, prior to the end of WWII mimicked New York City, it is only with the embrace of the automobile did the modern auto dominated city developed.

As to the 200 Motor Vehicles per 1000 people, remember that included trucks. In the 1920s and 1930s most cities pushed for trucks to replace horses, so the city did not have to clean up after the horses. Many of the motor vehicles purchased during the 1920s and 1930s in urban areas where such local delivery trucks. In my home city of Pittsburgh, the Streetcar system had to end its own fright hauling business in 1940 due to the fact so many businesses had adopted trucks to haul goods around that they no longer saw the Streetcar system as a fast alternative (it had been when the horse was use to haul goods). This demand for trucks, and the subsequent flexibility trucks provided, did in a number of Inter-Urban Streetcar systems. Interurbans tended to be more rural then urban and depended not only on passenger service, but freight service. For example the City of Hershey Streetcar system failed when Hershey switched from having farmers haul their milk to the Streetcar stop and instead had trucks pick up the milk directly from the farmers. THis mid 1920 change, killed off a income stream for that interurban Streetcar and forced it to close down.

Just a comment that 200 motor vehicles per 1000 people included trucks and a lot of vehicles in rural areas. These Rural vehicle, when they burned leaded gasoline, would have the effect minimize by the fact on a per mile basis, the vehicle count was low. Urban areas, would see a concentration of lead as more and more people drove to work just based on the number of vehicle in a relatively much smaller area.

I have found that most people living today can not even image living in a society without access to an automobile, yet that was the norm as late as 1945 in urban areas. I have found people refusing to accept that people can survive without cars but that was the norm for most people's great grand parents.
It was hypothesized 80 years ago that the fall of the Roman Empire was due to lead plates, goblets leveymg Jan 2013 #1
Proving it, for the current era, is news. truebluegreen Jan 2013 #2
Maybe it is "news" to others who do not already have that information. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #28
Great point! Do me a favor Orrex Jan 2013 #29
I stand corrected. People have known for at least 1900 years that ingesting lead is dangerous leveymg Jan 2013 #72
Thanks--that's a nice summary of the part about general ill health due to lead Orrex Jan 2013 #75
I think too much is being made about this story. I don't view it as news or even as original leveymg Jan 2013 #76
Also lead pipes for water supplies. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #51
I don't buy it. what is the mechanism through which increased exposure to lead increases HiPointDem Jan 2013 #3
From Wikipedia: Ptah Jan 2013 #4
i remember when similar studies were done in the 70s. there were problems with them then, & HiPointDem Jan 2013 #5
Well, absent any other information, I'll go with Wikiedia's summary. Ptah Jan 2013 #6
here's some information: HiPointDem Jan 2013 #7
How does that information differ from the Wikipedia citation? Ptah Jan 2013 #9
how do you explain the pre-1925 rise in murder and the drop circa 1937-1965? Lead began HiPointDem Jan 2013 #10
Good point. Ptah Jan 2013 #14
The relevant poisoning is on developing brains, not adult brains jeff47 Jan 2013 #32
yes, they line up well for the crime of aggravated assault, in the cities chosen, in the time HiPointDem Jan 2013 #52
Based on your memory. jeff47 Jan 2013 #59
Prohibition ended on 12/5/1933 and professionally manufactured alcohol became more readily available AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #34
'it's possible....' but unlikely to have had such a large effect on murder rates. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #39
Ever heard of a lead pipe? zeemike Jan 2013 #35
yes, i have. presumably they existed 1937-1965 as well. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #37
"adjusted for confounding factors" AllyCat Jan 2013 #38
why should it adjust for *any* causes? it's a graph of the murder rate, period. i'm not shouting HiPointDem Jan 2013 #43
Because there are other sources of lead in the environment, AllyCat Jan 2013 #47
Did they go away between 1937 and 1965? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #48
The rate of people being Killed in Europe in 1946 was a HUGE DROP from from 1944 happyslug Jan 2013 #69
Military deaths/war deaths aren't part of the murder rate statistics. They're part of the general HiPointDem Jan 2013 #98
Lead paint, and the switch from lead pipe water systems after 1900, better reporting happyslug Jan 2013 #62
i'm not convinced by all the ad hoc, maybe this maybe that stuff on lead pipes & lead paint, HiPointDem Jan 2013 #79
Prior to 1935 we had NO national data base for crime happyslug Jan 2013 #83
I already acknowledged the point about national data. But we do have data for a lot of big HiPointDem Jan 2013 #86
Chipping paint in tenement slums? MADem Jan 2013 #103
There was chipping paint in rural homes too. And there was chipping lead paint circa 1910- HiPointDem Jan 2013 #111
Well, a lot of people were very busy for the first five years of the forties... MADem Jan 2013 #113
lead was used for many things KT2000 Jan 2013 #105
Yes, & what was the lead source that declined precipitously in the 1910s-20s such that the murder HiPointDem Jan 2013 #108
that is what I mean KT2000 Jan 2013 #112
industry pr? what industry has a vested interest in lead these days? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #114
Please note: KT2000 Jan 2013 #120
lead is a *proven* toxin, & has *proven* effects on physical & mental development (i.e developmental HiPointDem Jan 2013 #122
Your math is wrong. 1935 plus at least 20 years (more for cumulative effect) is 1955 SharonAnn Jan 2013 #66
lead began being added to fuel about 1925, not 1935. murder rates dropped dramatically ~1937-1965. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #74
But most Americans did NOT use cars till bout 1954 happyslug Jan 2013 #82
200 cars/1000 people in 1930 = 200% increase from 1900, 100% increase from 1920. And car HiPointDem Jan 2013 #87
Purchased of cars were concentrated in the Rural and Suburban areas prior to WWII happyslug Jan 2013 #96
Here's the problem with your analysis. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #97
Hmmm... krispos42 Jan 2013 #88
'Freakanomics" is right-wing garbage, Steve Levitt is a right-wing hack, and this lead theory HiPointDem Jan 2013 #89
The book didn't mention race as a factor, as far as I can recall. krispos42 Jan 2013 #90
The authors absolutely mention it. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #99
I don't doubt it was in the paper they wrote krispos42 Jan 2013 #106
it was in the book too; not directly, but the whole argument turns on differential abortion rates HiPointDem Jan 2013 #107
Gas isn't/wasn't the only delivery mechanism, though--lead paint was an issue too. MADem Jan 2013 #102
No, it wasn't, but none of the other sources you mention disappeared in the teens and 20s, which HiPointDem Jan 2013 #110
Well, in the teens, a lot of potential criminals went off to war. MADem Jan 2013 #115
not really. us ww1 deaths were .13% of its population. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #116
Well, they didn't all have to die--they could come home wounded, or with PTSD, or healthy-- MADem Jan 2013 #117
same could be said of vietnam vets, but it didn't happen. this is all ad hoc rationalizing because HiPointDem Jan 2013 #119
I'll admit I like the lead hypothesis--it seems very logical to me! nt MADem Jan 2013 #121
Not so much...for example, it's pretty well-accepted that lead exposure = decreased IQ. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #123
There has been a drop in violent crime in almost every big city. WCGreen Jan 2013 #8
why would lead just affect violent crime rates? rather than crime generally, i mean. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #11
Because it's specifically violent crime that's linked to lead poisoning? Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #41
lol. i read your link. the theoretical construct cited has to do with impulse control, which isn't HiPointDem Jan 2013 #46
Impulse control, aggression, and low IQ... Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #53
none of which are specific to aggravated assault or violence. but speaking of drugs: HiPointDem Jan 2013 #54
Again... Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #63
...your first link... HiPointDem Jan 2013 #70
That was a drug war, something generally removed when it comes to overall murder rates happyslug Jan 2013 #68
and did the authors of such studies control for effects of 'drug war'? & how is it possible to HiPointDem Jan 2013 #71
Pay the $39 a get the actual report. happyslug Jan 2013 #77
wait, you seem to know all the details, why can't you just explain it? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #78
Because report of violent crime are more reliable then other crimes happyslug Jan 2013 #65
that's a reason we might pay more attention to violent crime stats rather than other crime stats, HiPointDem Jan 2013 #73
around here we used to have many murders, shootings by the foreign gang bangers..then Obama was Sunlei Jan 2013 #56
Except the correlation between eliminating leaded gasoline and declining violent crime... Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #12
I don't believe that just because someone says so in a news report. I can see it doesn't HiPointDem Jan 2013 #15
Except someone didn't just say so in a news report. Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #17
but i haven't read those papers, and no one has posted them on DU. they posted news reports. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #19
Except this says precisely what it's claimed to. Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #21
as you are the sort of person who thinks name-calling is an acceptable discussion tactic, you HiPointDem Jan 2013 #26
No, I haven't called you any names. Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #27
I posted a Wikepedia link that links to that research. Ptah Jan 2013 #22
First yes, if you read the article you would know fasttense Jan 2013 #24
i didn't say incarceration rates always follow violent crimes rates. i posted the stats on incar- HiPointDem Jan 2013 #33
Thank God for the uk/eu news and uk medical reports or Americans would never know what harms them. Sunlei Jan 2013 #55
except most of the research was done in the us & reported in the us as well. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #57
not these days, the corporations have much stronger control and our American news has declined. Sunlei Jan 2013 #58
yeah, that's why outlets like "forbes" are discussing this research (done in the us), because of HiPointDem Jan 2013 #100
You mean biochemically? Recursion Jan 2013 #31
Where are the people in our country getting lead contamination from? Maraya1969 Jan 2013 #13
Soil, paint and coal burning power plants come to mind Fumesucker Jan 2013 #16
Plus, if you read the MJ article, old windows being lowered and raised Hestia Jan 2013 #67
the main way used to be leaded paint & gas. since both were banned, average blood levels of lead HiPointDem Jan 2013 #18
Check the CDC, which keeps stats on lead across 50 states. Their data do correlate high lead ancianita Jan 2013 #20
can you link to one of those pages where these correlations are shown or described? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #36
My mistatement. I meant that their lead measures data are correlated by others with crime. I'm ancianita Jan 2013 #81
and here's some more analysis from a public health researcher: HiPointDem Jan 2013 #101
Thanks. There's data from national to local levels, and it's all helping to make this case. ancianita Jan 2013 #104
you apparently didn't read what i posted. It says two things: most of the data just shows HiPointDem Jan 2013 #109
decades of lead shot,old pipes,soils,dust,silt beds everywhere water runs off. Sunlei Jan 2013 #30
China, in part. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #42
We live in a house that is over 100 years old. AllyCat Jan 2013 #44
Firing ranges. morningfog Jan 2013 #84
Are bullets made out of lead? Maraya1969 Jan 2013 #93
Check this out: morningfog Jan 2013 #94
Most recent Mother Jones: America's Real Criminal Element: Lead Fuddnik Jan 2013 #23
+1 xchrom Jan 2013 #25
perhaps the answer today is the medical treatment with chelators as a routine health care. Sunlei Jan 2013 #40
We asked about chelation treatment for our kids when they had levels AllyCat Jan 2013 #45
That experience must have been very upsetting for you parents! Sunlei Jan 2013 #50
I wonder if lead could also be responsible (partly) dotymed Jan 2013 #49
Weird bit of trivia here dmallind Jan 2013 #60
The threat of lead was sown long ago. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #61
Mercury is very close to lead on the periodic table No Compromise Jan 2013 #64
The real problem is Lead is under Carbon in the table happyslug Jan 2013 #80
Too bad you are already tomb-stoned. Now you'll never know what's silly about that statement. cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #91
Close the firing ranges! morningfog Jan 2013 #85
Shut down the bullet manufacturers! ancianita Jan 2013 #92
I thought that was common knowledge noamnety Jan 2013 #95
It may be "trace" quantities of lead that are responsible jmowreader Jan 2013 #118
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes, lead poisoning could...»Reply #96