Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What happened to the estate tax? Had to keep that at no tax on 10 million to create jobs? [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)16. Simple fact, although people may not want to hear it; the exemption was NEVER going to go back down
to $1 Million.
The reason? States like California. New York. States with powerful, influential Democratic Senators and Representatives, by the way.
States with real estate values- rightly or wrongly, fact is that's where they are- which can easily put the "estates" of fairly ordinary folks within range of the old exemption. Leading to heirs potentially having to sell the family home to pay the taxes on it.
This is why the exemption was going to be raised.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What happened to the estate tax? Had to keep that at no tax on 10 million to create jobs? [View all]
No Compromise
Jan 2013
OP
On the estate tax, the deal worked out was better than the Senate bill that previously passed
ProSense
Jan 2013
#2
Individual estates up to $5 million are excluded, estates above that pay 40%. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#3
It's $5 million per person so for a married couple/family estate it's $10 million total. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#8
As long as the married couple is not gay, in which case the feds still screw them over on taxes
awake
Jan 2013
#7
Yes the Federal government doesn't recognize same-sex marriage re tax purposes...
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#9
He wanted to raise taxes on people at the top without them going up for people making, say, 40K a yr
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#17
Right, but had the Bush cuts expired- something I would have been fine with, BTW-
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#21
The original cutoff was 250k because thats already where the top maginal rate started.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#36
Simple fact, although people may not want to hear it; the exemption was NEVER going to go back down
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#16
The house we are renting in San Diego could, with just a little renovation, be valued at $500K.
haele
Jan 2013
#25
Original owner who bought a house in 1957 for $20K . California real estate market pre Prop 13 upped
haele
Jan 2013
#30
And the "ordinary" couple that owns 20 of them would be exempt from taxes.
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2013
#32
They wont find the etates liable now, since the exemption has been raised permanently.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#38
Hell no, they instead spread like cancer through the ideological spectrum.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2013
#24
Yes and no. The idle rich don't compete for jobs at the lumberyard. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2013
#34