Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Citizens United Correct? [View all]Recursion
(56,582 posts)29. The idea of corporate personhood dates back to the 1400's
That in itself isn't a new idea; Roberts quoted it because it was such an established concept.
The novel idea was that Congress does not have the authority to limit spending on political speech, which had been established for over a century that they did. Corporate personhood is the wrong thing to complain about; that's as old as the East India Company.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#13
" in an oppressive, authoritarian police state, you don't." No totally, not yet.
Lady Freedom Returns
Jan 2013
#47
You are stuck in semantics and theories while the facts are in your face.
Fire Walk With Me
Jan 2013
#56
Corporations, or any paper entity, are not people. Money is not speech.
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#21
One last kick to your attention seeking flame bait. "It falls short of an abomination" is only your
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#28
You are right. "An abomination" might not be all that much of a big deal...
reACTIONary
Jan 2013
#32
OK, it seems you really want to talk, my apologies for assuming that you were just
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2013
#37
Actually, the ACLU said yes to a very narrow issue and the court ruled very broadly against
Puregonzo1188
Jan 2013
#51