Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. A L-III licensing
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jan 2013

Will do it actually, you really don't need to ban them. The licensing is so strict....

'the NRA claims.....' spanone Jan 2013 #1
So, it's really just for... Hayabusa Jan 2013 #2
The usefulness of AR designs is arguable... aikoaiko Jan 2013 #3
The .223 round is available in a variety of bullet weights and velocities. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #8
I like .223 sarisataka Jan 2013 #20
I'm fond of the peep sights and recoil reduction. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #23
Anyone with a finger can empty a mag sarisataka Jan 2013 #29
Talk about whistling past the ducking graveyard. Robb Jan 2013 #35
It would do so sarisataka Jan 2013 #42
Nice slam dunk. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #62
It's useful for hunting and home defense, JoeyT Jan 2013 #4
That rifle in the picture is not a .223 or 5.55mm... it's just a scary looking .22lr OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #5
I spotted that on the magazine too. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #16
Coupla points Tab Jan 2013 #19
So why then is it the rifle of choice for embassy defense? Remmah2 Jan 2013 #6
Read the last sentence nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #9
The journalist is a blowhard being paid to write as he is told. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #14
Really... nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #17
Are there minimum qualifications required to be a journalist? Remmah2 Jan 2013 #21
So where exactly did he lie nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #22
The intent and direction of the article is a sly lie. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #24
So the AR-15 was not commisioned to nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #25
So you're saying that the gun wasn't designed to do what was in the contract? rbixby Jan 2013 #33
Perhaps we're tired of kids getting killed. Robb Jan 2013 #36
A home does not have the security issues that an Embassy faces ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #47
Nonetheless CRS says there's no evidence the AWB reduced murder number. jody Jan 2013 #7
As far as hunting with AR rifles... Not much different than other rifles. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #10
Research is for suckas! Marinedem Jan 2013 #11
If I had to guess that last one is a .308. Arctic Dave Jan 2013 #18
Do you have any posing with dead kids? Robb Jan 2013 #37
Typical. Marinedem Jan 2013 #49
Bringing up all the dead kids makes you real uncomfortable. Robb Jan 2013 #51
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #56
I agree, and particularly agree with your statement AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #60
Well, better luck next time. Robb Jan 2013 #61
What you say is untrue. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #64
I'm delighted in your new interest in board unity, to say nothing of promotion of Democrats. Robb Jan 2013 #66
Actually, I've pointed out many times that vitrolic attacks on Democrats who own firearms AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #70
Does that Berserker Jan 2013 #53
You're going to rely upon facts? That's just going to slow things down. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2013 #58
Simple ban semi-autos, including handguns. Hoyt Jan 2013 #12
A L-III licensing nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #15
The cowards of the NRA strike again. nt madinmaryland Jan 2013 #13
If you are hunting human beings and defending your home in Syria? Agnosticsherbet Jan 2013 #26
The problem you're going to have with any of these arguments is the general lack of knowledge Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #27
I guess if you are a bad shot, it improves your chances. liberal N proud Jan 2013 #28
I'm a pretty good shot and it improves my chances sir pball Jan 2013 #76
Imagine the kind of home invasion in which a spray and pray shooter would be useful. Bucky Jan 2013 #30
Amen, brother. I don't go anywhere without my mutated anthrax.... Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #31
This guy's already made one critical mistake... derby378 Jan 2013 #32
What's best for shooting a six year old? Robb Jan 2013 #39
Really? A "do you still beat your wife" question? Come on. derby378 Jan 2013 #43
It's like baseball stats, only really fucking creepy. Robb Jan 2013 #44
Nice use of loaded words there derby378 Jan 2013 #45
I keep my words loaded. One in the pipe, too. Robb Jan 2013 #52
How many people have died as a result of the drug war? Remmah2 Jan 2013 #82
Your firearms have harmed no one YET. Robb Jan 2013 #84
With 300 million plus firearms in the private hands... beevul Jan 2013 #86
Translation: current gun deaths are acceptable to you. Robb Jan 2013 #87
Are you calling for a ban on booze? StretchMaK Jan 2013 #89
Oopsie. Robb Jan 2013 #94
Intent of the Second Amendment. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #92
I'd ask you to kindly keep your words out of my mouth, thanks. beevul Jan 2013 #97
A man with a hammer has harmed no one yet. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #91
What's the best hammer to kill 20 kids with? Robb Jan 2013 #93
Why do you ask? Berserker Jan 2013 #55
Shouldn't this post be in hunting and outdoors? Remmah2 Jan 2013 #65
I read that today and it backs up what my RW family members say about hunting witn an AR-15 underpants Jan 2013 #34
The areticle posted by the OP Jenoch Jan 2013 #38
Nonsense written with noble intentions is still nonsense. The AR-15 platform... slackmaster Jan 2013 #40
Hammers were originally designed to pound nails, now they murder more people than rifles. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #67
I'm sure that's a subject close to your heart, "Remmah" 2 slackmaster Jan 2013 #71
Yup Remmah2 Jan 2013 #72
Pure NRA bullshit. Hugabear Jan 2013 #74
Where in the article is the NRA ever mentioned? Remmah2 Jan 2013 #80
The NRA and gun enthusiasts are cherry-picking FBI data. Read the link that I provided. Hugabear Jan 2013 #81
Hammers do not require a background check. Remmah2 Jan 2013 #83
If only someone at that school had a hammer. We need a John Henry in every classroom, armed with a Erose999 Jan 2013 #77
This is false former-republican Jan 2013 #41
You just had to insert facts into this thread, didn't you... ManiacJoe Jan 2013 #46
I figured why not former-republican Jan 2013 #48
It seemed to kill 26 people at close range pretty easily in Sandy Hook neverforget Jan 2013 #54
I didn't state it wouldn't kill at close range former-republican Jan 2013 #57
Arguing technical details is fine. But the end result is that these are weapons neverforget Jan 2013 #59
It's a semiautomatic rifle like any other. rrneck Jan 2013 #50
If someone can't hit a deer in one or two single shots... Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2013 #63
Tired argument jp76 Jan 2013 #73
You know what? It's a sport. You win some, you lose some. Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2013 #78
Not just a miss jp76 Jan 2013 #79
Anyone that believes the AR-15 Harmony Blue Jan 2013 #68
The NRA are lying nazi bastards workinclasszero Jan 2013 #69
"For that time a Mastedon chooses to demolish your home..." Taverner Jan 2013 #75
In a house, a 5.56mm generally safer than a 9mm handgun NickB79 Jan 2013 #85
Yep! MrScorpio Jan 2013 #88
Great line from the OP.... rppper Jan 2013 #90
A .357 can be used for deer hunting, (handgun or carbine.) Remmah2 Jan 2013 #95
its a slaughter, not a hunt with this type of weapon samsingh Jan 2013 #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The NRA Claims the AR-15 ...»Reply #15