Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did you just see Rachael's story on Shell Oil rig in Alaska that has run aground? [View all]highplainsdem
(48,917 posts)2. Yes, it's really scary. Arctic oil exploration could lead to an uncontrollable disaster. See these
links:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4985785
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/oil-exploration-under-arctic-ice-could-cause-uncontrollable-natural-disaster-2349788.html
The first is my Sept. 2011 LBN topic about that Guardian story. I've posted a lot of LBN topics, but this story was frightening enough that I haven't forgotten it.
I'll just copy my LBN OP below:
___________
Tue Sep-06-11 12:46 AM
Oil exploration under Arctic ice could cause 'uncontrollable' natural disasterSource: The Independent
Oil from an undersea leak will not only be very hard to deal with in Arctic conditions, it will interact with the surface sea ice and become absorbed in it, and will be transported by it for as much as 1,000 miles across the ocean, according to Peter Wadhams, Professor of ocean physics at the University of Cambridge.
The interaction, discovered in large-scale experiments 30 years ago, means that the Arctic oil rush, which was given a huge boost last week with a $3.2 billion (£1.9bn) investment from Exxon Mobil, is likely to be the riskiest form of oil exploration ever undertaken, said Professor Wadhams, who is a former director of Cambridge's Scott Polar Research Institute.
-snip-
"The oil is caught underneath the ice, so you can't get at immediately to clean it up or burn it off. You don't know exactly where it is, and then it gets encapsulated in the new ice which grows underneath, so you then have a kind of oil sandwich inside the pack ice.
"And that's being transported around the Arctic and isn't released until spring, when it may be several hundred or even a thousand miles from the source of the spill, so you can have a huge area of the Arctic becoming polluted by oil without initially it being clear where that oil is."
-snip-
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/oil-exploration-under-arctic-ice-could-cause-uncontrollable-natural-disaster-2349788.html
The article mentions the other risks of going after the oil in the Arctic -- "ice encroachment, the remoteness of the Arctic, darkness, extreme weather, deep water, high seas, freezing conditions and icebergs" -- but the most worrisome information here is about how the oil will interact with ice, and this information is based on a study done off the coast of Canada in the 1970s.
Not only would spilled oil be trapped in the ice and transported vast distances by it, but when it thaws it will be still be fresh oil because the ice will have kept it from weathering. And Professor Wadhams points out it will be released on the edges of pack ice, where migratory birds feed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
18 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did you just see Rachael's story on Shell Oil rig in Alaska that has run aground? [View all]
Auntie Bush
Jan 2013
OP
That barge has been in service since 1983 and is specifically designed for Arctic service
Stinky The Clown
Jan 2013
#1
Yes, it's really scary. Arctic oil exploration could lead to an uncontrollable disaster. See these
highplainsdem
Jan 2013
#2
I don't know how familiar you are with the history of Shell's attempts to set up
Blue_In_AK
Jan 2013
#15