Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Never understimate the ability of a Teabagger to shoot themself in the foot RomneyLies Jan 2013 #1
So 17 members don't vote for Boehner on the first ballot and then Boehner makes PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #2
That would be Boehner's last term as a Congressman RomneyLies Jan 2013 #4
Dems would never give him the votes... brooklynite Jan 2013 #5
Yes - I suspect the Democratic caucus will be united tomorrow in opposing Boehner... PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #19
Democrats will not take back the House until Democrats take back State Governments Bandit Jan 2013 #34
Well, that would certainly change the meaning of the word "leverage" BlueStreak Jan 2013 #9
Unless a candidate comes forward to actually run against Boehner it will probably just be a protest PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #10
If it goes past one ballot, it goes AT LEAST three ballots. RomneyLies Jan 2013 #14
Regardless of the GOP internal politics, I think it is time to ask BlueStreak Jan 2013 #15
There's two possible scenerios... HooptieWagon Jan 2013 #13
I can't see the second option. BlueStreak Jan 2013 #16
Well, the second scenerio only requires the votes of 17 moderate pukes... HooptieWagon Jan 2013 #30
Re: Cantor, that's where I am now. How could he be any less helpful than Boehner BlueStreak Jan 2013 #32
It is possible that Ryan could step in, after all he was VP candidate.... Bandit Jan 2013 #35
Certainly a possibility. I wouldn't do that if I were Ryan BlueStreak Jan 2013 #37
I posted about this very thing last night. Lone_Star_Dem Jan 2013 #24
Good. ChangeUp106 Jan 2013 #3
I wonder if the Dems will exploit this NYC Liberal Jan 2013 #6
The 17 that would do that are "Boehner's people" BlueStreak Jan 2013 #20
It is too bad Boehner isn't trustworthy enough for Democrats to work with. Orangepeel Jan 2013 #7
Note the number needed is 217 (assuming all members vote) as there are 2 vacant seats in the house. PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #12
*Who* is this *saying* this?!1 n/t UTUSN Jan 2013 #8
Ron Meyer Lex Jan 2013 #11
Just a note, the Freaks at Freak Repubelick are all giddy over this RomneyLies Jan 2013 #17
That's a great line!!! PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #21
But... FresnoDemocrat Jan 2013 #31
The comments at the site in response to this non story are a hoot! Stinky The Clown Jan 2013 #18
"chuse" is acceptable... brooklynite Jan 2013 #22
Going to ask again, is it wrong for me to hope he is forced out or resigns loyalkydem Jan 2013 #23
Depends...do you want anything to be done for the next two years? brooklynite Jan 2013 #25
No. Who do you think would replace him ? n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #26
The question is whether Cantor would stab Boehner in the back... PennsylvaniaMatt Jan 2013 #27
My money is on Cantor loyalkydem Jan 2013 #29
I don't think Cantor would be elected Speaker. But, I think they'd all vote for Paul Ryan. Zen Democrat Jan 2013 #28
"Everybody take position... theKed Jan 2013 #33
ridiculous. for pete's sake, CNS News????? cali Jan 2013 #36
Unfortunately, I think he was just re-elected... SidDithers Jan 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congressmen Confirm That ...»Reply #26