Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nikia

(11,411 posts)
35. While I understand that your on the edge
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jan 2013

I can't help but think of the area where I grew up that has a large contingent of people voting against any tax increase. Almost every tax levy has been voted down in the past 10 years because of them. As a result the schools and town infrastructure and services have gone to hell. Yes, factories have closed and the ones that stay or have come in pay a lot less. They are poorer, which is why revenue is less. More of them are saying, we can't afford more taxes as the school buildings, bridges, and roads fall apart. They say we can't afford more taxes as wild animals overrun the town because the city no longer hires for someone to do that. They cut the police department as heroin and meth dealers come in and thefts, including armed robberies increase. They cry for someone to do something, but we couldn't possibly afford to pay more taxes.
I am sorry that you can't afford more taxes, but unfortunately less tax revenue has consequences.

if you pay into social security... Mona Jan 2013 #1
how so arely staircase Jan 2013 #2
Because the payroll tax cut was apparently the one tax cut they didn't want to extend/alter. n/t W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #3
Not to defend Obama, but the payroll tax cut that was just ended was the same mistaken payroll tax coti Jan 2013 #25
Yes... W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #30
Good! We have to fund Social Security and it should have never been cut in the first place. TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #36
Youre kidding, right?? darkangel218 Jan 2013 #28
No. n/t W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #29
You probably just got a big tax hike jfern Jan 2013 #4
Yeah. W_HAMILTON Jan 2013 #6
payrol.ss.cuts arely staircase Jan 2013 #7
To the rate that people have paid since the 1980s. It's worth it to have Social Security JDPriestly Jan 2013 #12
yes arely staircase Jan 2013 #19
I would have taken an 8% reduction in yearly income. Which would have meant me having to find JaneyVee Jan 2013 #5
Our minivan is paid for, so there was always going to be a roof over our heads. Kennah Jan 2013 #8
SHOTGUN! JaneyVee Jan 2013 #15
I'm somewhat serious in the belief we may see tent cities of people living out of their vans Kennah Jan 2013 #21
1300 bucks a year arely staircase Jan 2013 #9
Hey! We who are now retired used to pay those 1300 bucks a year more than you will pay. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #13
Yes, I gotta agree. RebelOne Jan 2013 #32
I was told earlier that the $150-$200 that would probably leave each paycheck alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #10
100 dollar hit arely staircase Jan 2013 #11
We who were not born yesterday paid the rates that would have come back. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #14
I don't think it's an issue of people not wanting to pay taxes Kennah Jan 2013 #16
No, it's an issue of people NOT living that close to the edge Occulus Jan 2013 #17
Perhaps I was unclear, but I was not talking about one percenters. Kennah Jan 2013 #20
thats me arely staircase Jan 2013 #18
Buy we did it. We did not have a lot of the things people have today -- cell phones, etc. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #22
Our sons cannot fathom, 15.85 % home loan interest SoCalDem Jan 2013 #23
Read Elizabeth Warren some time Kennah Jan 2013 #24
Totally agree ... mrsadm Jan 2013 #26
the arrogant lefties like every single Democrat in Congress Enrique Jan 2013 #33
time for the 1% to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan. shoulda listened to us. dipshits. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #27
don't look at your next paycheck Enrique Jan 2013 #31
Don't count your chickens (or Benjamins) before they've hatched n2doc Jan 2013 #34
While I understand that your on the edge Nikia Jan 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I could not have taken a1...»Reply #35